Debra Ann Livingston
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the district court's dismissal of Reddington's claims under section 741, and we also affirm the district court's refusal to award attorneys' fees to the Hospital.”
“For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the district court.”
“Because we find the relevant provision to be unambiguous and Dobrova's interpretation of "previously," as used in Section 212(h), to be in error, we deny Dobrova's petition for review.”
“We conclude that this Court's order granting without limitation L-3's motion to tax costs pursuant to Rule 39(a)(4) entitled L-3 to seek from the district court any and all permissible items of appellate costs properly taxed by that court pursuant to Rule 39(e). Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court.”
“For all of the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the bankruptcy court is therefore VACATED and the case is REMANDED to the district court with instructions to remand to the bankruptcy court for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.”
“Because we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding the evidence of Favreau's pending appeal and that Favreau's other arguments are also without merit, we affirm the judgment of conviction.”
“The order of suppression entered by the district court is VACATED, and this case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.”
“Petitioner has provided no convincing reason why this exception applies to the Article 78 filings in this case. For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.”
“Because the district court's 3292 order was supported by sufficient evidence; because 3292 does not require that the foreign evidence sought be necessary for an indictment, nor that it be obtainable only through an official request to a foreign government; and because district courts may rely on ex parte proceedings in issuing 3292 orders, we Affirm.”
“With these questions decided, we lack jurisdiction to further review the order of removal in this case. Accordingly, we dismiss Morris's petition for review.”
“We find no other error in the prosecutor's summations and no procedural defect rising to the level of plain error. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the district court's judgment of conviction and sentence.”
“Because the government is seeking to admit the state court order for a non-hearsay purpose and because the district court's analysis pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 403 did not account for the order's probative value if offered to show knowledge, we vacate the district court's order and remand for the district court to conduct a Rule 403 analysis consistent with this opinion.”
Put Judge Livingston's record to work
Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Livingston actually rules, not a generic AI guess.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Livingston's own signed orders and cites them.