Beth Robinson

How Judge Robinson rules, drawn from 33 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Position
circuit
Appointed by
Joseph R. Biden (Democratic)
Commissioned
2021-11-05
Education
Dartmouth College (B.A., 1986, philosophy and government; summa cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa); University of Chicago Law School (J.D., 1989; Order of the Coif; associate editor, University of Chicago Law Review)
Signed orders read
33

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Petroleos de Venezuela S.A. v. MUFG Union Bank, N.A.
20-3858; 20-4127 · 2022-10-13
Appeal (appellants (plaintiffs, the PDV Entities)) Moot / procedural

“Because the New York Court of Appeals has not addressed these issues and they are important to the State's choice-of-law regime and status as a commercial center, we CERTIFY questions to the New York Court of Appeals. DECISION RESERVED AND QUESTIONS CERTIFIED.”

Peoples v. Leon
21-956-pr · 2023-03-20
Appeal (appellants (defendants -- New York parole officials)) Granted

“we hold that Alexander is entitled to absolute immunity for her acts in 2018, and Leon is entitled to qualified immunity for her acts in 2018. Accordingly, the district court's judgment denying summary judgment for Defendants on these issues is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Rynasko v. New York University
21-1333-cv · 2023-03-23
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Christina Rynasko)) Granted in part

“We accordingly AFFIRM the judgment of the district court in part, VACATE in part, and REMAND for further proceedings.”

Bohnak v. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
22-319 · 2023-08-24
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Nancy Bohnak)) Granted

“we REVERSE the district court's judgment dismissing Bohnak's claims for damages and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Mirlis v. Greer
21-202 · 2023-08-30
Appeal (appellant (defendant Sarah Greer)) Denied

“For the reasons set forth above, we AFFIRM the district court's judgment.”

Loomis v. ACE American Insurance Company
22-863(L); 22-1037 · 2024-01-23
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff William Loomis)) Moot / procedural

“we CERTIFY [questions] to the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana ... This panel retains its jurisdiction.”

King v. Aramark Services Inc.
22-1237 · 2024-03-20
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Kristen King)) Granted in part

“we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court dismissing King's NYSHRL claims. We VACATE the judgment of the district court with respect to King's Title VII claims and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Stankiewicz v. Garland
21-6265(L); 22-6121(Con) · 2024-05-31
Petition for review (petitioner (Aleksandra Malgorzata Stankiewicz)) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, Stankiewicz's petition for review is GRANTED, the agency's decision is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Michel v. Yale University
23-222 · 2024-08-07
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Jonathan Michel)) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, Yale is entitled to summary judgment, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.”

United States v. Slaughter
23-6055 · 2024-08-08
Appeal (appellant (defendant Ellva Slaughter)) Denied

“In this case, Slaughter has not established that the Plan causes underrepresentation of Black and Hispanic or Latino people in SDNY venires. ... For the above reasons, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.”

Salazar v. National Basketball Association
23-1147 · 2024-10-15
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Michael Salazar)) Granted

“the district court erred by holding that Salazar is not a 'subscriber of goods or services' from the NBA. Accordingly, we VACATE the district court's judgment and REMAND for further proceedings.”

Government Employees Insurance Company v. Mayzenberg
22-2537 · 2024-11-12
Appeal (appellants (defendants, the Mayzenberg Defendants)) Moot / procedural

“Because we cannot confidently predict how the New York Court of Appeals would rule on this issue ... we hereby CERTIFY a question to the New York Court of Appeals.”

Draft for Judge Robinson with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Robinson, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Robinson's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace