Barrington D. Parker Jr.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit circuit Appointed by George W. Bush (Republican) 28 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Ruqiang Yu v. Holder
11-2546-ag · 2012-09-07
Petition for review (petitioner (Ruqiang Yu)) Granted

“Petition for review GRANTED.”

Doe v. Holder
12-3779-ag · 2014-08-19
Petition for review (petitioner (John Doe)) Denied

“Accordingly, the petition for review is DENIED.”

Vasconcelos v. Lynch
15-1308-ag · 2016-11-02
Petition for review (petitioner (Rui Gilberto Enes de Vasconcelos)) Denied

“Because the administrative record supports the agency's finding that Vasconcelos waived his right to a hearing by submitting an ESTA application and entering the United States pursuant to the VWP, the petition is DENIED.”

Mota v. Barr
19-1385 · 2020-08-17
Petition for review (petitioner (Aderito Ferraz Mota)) Denied

“We DENY the petition.”

Ceara v. Deacon
17-569-pr · 2019-02-21
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Rafael Ceara, pro se prisoner)) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the District Court is VACATED and the case is REMANDED to the District Court for further proceedings.”

Robinson v. Concentra Health Services, Inc.
13-3438-cv · 2015-03-24
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Sebrena Robinson)) Denied

“For these reasons, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.”

Orange County Water District v. Texaco Refining & Marketing, Inc.
15-3620-cv · 2017-06-12
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Orange County Water District)) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, we vacate the district court's grant of summary judgment on res judicata grounds and remand the District's action against BP and Shell to the Southern District of New York for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Catzin v. Thank You & Good Luck Corp.
17-3247 · 2018-08-08
Appeal (appellants (plaintiffs, low-wage laundromat workers)) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, the order of the District Court is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

ING Bank N.V. v. M/V TEMARA
16-3923(L) · 2018-06-13
Appeal (appellants (ING Bank, assignee of the contract supplier, and CEPSA, the physical supplier)) Granted in part

“For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM IN PART, VACATE IN PART, and REMAND to the District Court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Centro de la Comunidad Hispana de Locust Valley v. Town of Oyster Bay
15-2591-cv · 2017-08-22
Appeal (appellant (Town of Oyster Bay)) Denied

“The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.”

United States v. Colotti
21-932(L) · 2023-06-21
Appeal (appellants (defendants/petitioners, members of an organized-crime enterprise)) Denied

“Because we are confident that a properly instructed jury would have based the petitioners' 924(c) convictions upon a valid predicate crime of violence, we AFFIRM.”

United States v. Haverkamp
18-3735-cr · 2020-05-04
Appeal (appellant (defendant Paul Haverkamp)) Granted in part

“AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, AND REMANDED”

Put Judge Parker's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Parker actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Parker's own signed orders and cites them.