Amalya L. Kearse

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit circuit Appointed by Jimmy Carter (Democratic) 25 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Eiberger v. Sony Corp. of America
· 1980-05-02
Appeal (appellant (defendant Sony Corporation of America)) Granted in part

“We affirm the district court's ruling on liability on the grounds stated above, reverse on the question of damages, and remand for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. No costs.”

United States v. Ventura
· 1983-12-13
Appeal (appellant (defendant Armand Ventura)) Denied

“The judgment of conviction is affirmed.”

Green v. McCall
· 1987-06-24
Appeal (appellant (defendants United States Parole Commission and its members)) Denied

“The judgment of the district court enjoining the Commission to follow the specified procedures for parole grantees is in all respects affirmed.”

United States v. Wolfson
· 1995-05-10
Appeal (appellant (defendant Louis E. Wolfson)) Denied

“There being no right of access to the documents on the part of Wolfson or the public, the order of the district court is affirmed.”

Leslie v. Artuz
· 2000-10-17
Appeal (appellant (petitioner Anthony Leslie, state prisoner)) Denied

“We have considered all of Leslie's arguments on this appeal and have found in them no basis for reversal. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.”

Wallace v. Nash
· 2002-11-14
Appeal (appellant (petitioner Glenn Wallace, federal prisoner)) Granted

“The judgment is vacated, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.”

Khan v. Ashcroft
· 2003-12-09
Appeal (appellant (petitioner Fazila Khan)) Denied

“We have considered all of Khan's contentions on this appeal and have found them to be without merit. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.”

United States v. Riley
· 2006-06-21
Appeal (appellant (defendant Adrian Riley)) Denied

“We have considered all of Riley's arguments on this appeal and have found them to be without merit. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.”

Petrello v. White
· 2008-07-10
Appeal (appellant (defendants John C. White and White Investment L.P.)) Moot / procedural

“We conclude that the orders challenged by defendants are not appealable orders for the reasons discussed above, and on that basis we grant plaintiffs' motion to dismiss the appeals.”

Ideal Steel Supply Corp. v. Anza
· 2011-06-28
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Ideal Steel Supply Corporation)) Granted

“Vacated and remanded.”

Alphonso v. Commissioner
· 2013-02-06
Appeal (appellant (petitioner Christina A. Alphonso)) Granted

“For the reasons stated above, we vacate the grant of summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner and remand for further proceedings.”

United States v. Murdock
· 2013-11-08
Appeal (appellant (defendant Seth Murdock, pro se)) Granted

“We vacate the August Order of the district court and remand for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion, which should be expedited in light of Murdock's scheduled release from prison on November 15, 2013.”

Put Judge Kearse's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Kearse actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Kearse's own signed orders and cites them.