William H. Pryor Jr.

How Judge Pryor rules, drawn from 72 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Position
circuit
Appointed by
George W. Bush (Republican)
Commissioned
2005-06-10
Education
Northeast Louisiana University (now University of Louisiana at Monroe) (B.A., magna cum laude, 1984); Tulane University Law School (J.D., magna cum laude, 1987)
Signed orders read
72

How Judge Pryor decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Congress's power to define and punish offenses against the law of nations was confined by customary international law, placing conduct outside that tradition beyond the clause's reach.

“The power granted to Congress in the Offences Clause is limited by customary international law for two reasons.”

The court declined to classify particular invocations by religious sect, treating that inquiry as outside judicial competence.

“Whether invocations of ‘Lord of Lords’ or ‘the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Mohammed’ are ‘sectarian’ is best left to theologians, not courts of law.”

The ordinary meaning of a policy term was applied to the pleaded facts while leaving factually different versions of the same conduct unresolved.

“To be clear, we do not decide that the ordinary meaning of ‘suicide’ covers all imaginable instances of suicide-by-cop.”

In Finley, evidence of honest investigative mistakes did not support a claim of deliberate fabrication. The court examined contemporaneous communications and later testimony before affirming summary judgment.

“Fabrication requires bad faith.”

Procedural preferences

A request to declare that a defendant lacked a federal defense did not create federal-question jurisdiction over otherwise state-law claims.

“Because Patel’s request for a declaratory judgment does not fall within federal-question jurisdiction, we vacate the judgment against him and remand with instructions to dismiss his complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.”

A fugitive could not remain outside a family court's authority while using a separate lawsuit to attack those same proceedings.

“Because Vibe Ener remains a fugitive, her lawsuit collaterally attacks the very proceedings from which she absconded, and dismissal prevents her from using the judicial process only when it benefits her, we affirm.”

In his Russo concurrence, Pryor explained that severability concerns interpreting the statute in the case before the court; a judicial decree cannot repeal statutory text.

“Severability or separability is a question of statutory inter- pretation in a specific case.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Johanna Maria Vibe Ener v. Pedro Antonio Martin
19-12258 · 2021-02-22
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Johanna Vibe Ener)) Denied

“we affirm.”

Hasmukh Patel, M.D. v. Hamilton Medical Center, Inc.
19-13088 · 2020-07-30
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Hasmukh Patel)) Moot / procedural

“we vacate the judgment against him and remand with instructions to dismiss his complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.”

United States v. Peter Robert Bobal
19-10678 · 2020-11-30
Appeal (appellant (defendant Peter Bobal)) Denied

“We AFFIRM Bobal's conviction and sentence.”

R&R International Consulting LLC v. Banco Do Brasil S.A.
19-12466 · 2020-12-04
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff R&R International Consulting LLC)) Denied

“So we vacate in part and affirm in part.”

Jose Ramirez v. Statewide Harvesting & Hauling, LLC
20-11995 · 2021-05-21
Appeal (appellant (defendant Statewide Harvesting & Hauling, LLC)) Denied

“we affirm the judgment in favor of the crew leaders.”

Richard Leake v. James T. Drinkard
20-13868 · 2021-09-28
Appeal (appellants (plaintiffs Richard Leake and Michael Dean)) Denied

“we affirm.”

Rajesh C. Patel v. Rishi M. Patel
23-12847 · 2025-07-08
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff-debtor Rajesh C. Patel)) Denied

“we affirm.”

Top Tobacco, L.P. v. Star Importers & Wholesalers, Inc.
24-10765 · 2025-04-30
Appeal (appellants (defendants Star Importers & Wholesalers, Inc. and Amin Hudda)) Denied

“we affirm.”

John D. Carson v. Monsanto Company (en banc)
21-10994 · 2023-07-10
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff John Carson)) Moot / procedural

“we remand this appeal to the panel to decide whether Carson's suit is preempted.”

United States v. Andre Michael Dubois
22-10829 · 2025-06-02
Appeal (appellant (defendant Andre Dubois)) Denied

“We reinstate our previous opinion and affirm Andre Dubois's convictions and sentence.”

Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Buford Rollin
21-11643 · 2024-10-11
Appeal (appellants (Muscogee (Creek) Nation and related plaintiffs)) Granted

“we vacate its order and remand.”

Doris Sloan v. Drummond Company, Inc.
20-13179 · 2024-05-23
Petition for review (petitioner (Doris Sloan)) Moot / procedural

“We dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction.”

Draft for Judge Pryor with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Pryor, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Pryor's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace