Stanley Marcus

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit circuit Appointed by Bill Clinton (Democratic) 28 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Foster
97-4786 · 1998-09-24
Appeal (appellant (defendant Claude Foster)) Denied

“We have fully reviewed the record and the briefs and have carefully considered each of the issues on appeal, and, finding no merit to either, we affirm the ruling of the district court.”

Shields v. BellSouth Advertising and Publishing Corp.
99-11711 · 2001-06-19
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Paul Shields)) Denied

“In light of that answer, we conclude that Shields's ADA claim is barred by collateral estoppel, and accordingly affirm the district court in full.”

Downey v. Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corp.
01-15857 · 2002-12-09
Appeal (appellants (objectors Michael and Robin Hopkins)) Granted

“Accordingly, we vacate the court's order and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. VACATED AND REMANDED.”

Pruitt v. Jones
02-16853 · 2003-10-31
Appeal (appellant (petitioner Rodney Lynn Pruitt)) Denied

“Upon thorough review of the record, as well as careful consideration of the parties' briefs, we find no reversible error and affirm.”

Brooks v. County Commission of Jefferson County
05-15201 · 2006-04-18
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Delores M. Brooks)) Denied

“On appeal, Brooks argues the district court erred by finding she did not establish that the County's proffered reason for not promoting her was a pretext for discrimination. After careful review, we affirm.”

United States v. Smith
06-14077 · 2007-03-19
Appeal (appellant (defendant Isaac Jerome Smith)) Denied

“On appeal, Smith argues that: (1) the district court erred by finding that he used the ammunition 'in connection with' another felony offense; and (2) the district court erred under United States v. Booker ... After careful review, we affirm.”

Drury v. United States
07-12130 · 2007-11-13
Appeal (appellant (petitioner Carl M. Drury, Jr.)) Denied

“Upon the denial of his certiorari petition, Drury's conviction was final for purposes of the AEDPA's limitations period. Accordingly, we discern no error in the district court's dismissal of Drury's 2255 motion as time-barred. AFFIRMED.”

Berman v. Blount Parrish & Co.
07-15956 · 2008-04-23
Appeal (appellants (plaintiffs M. Daniel Berman and Joseph A. Stanley, Jr.)) Denied

“The district court dismissed the action as barred by the statute of limitations. We affirm.”

Lenis v. U.S. Attorney General
07-13629 · 2008-05-05
Petition for review (petitioner (Clara Ines Lenis)) Moot / procedural

“After thorough review, we dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction.”

United States v. Valarezo-Orobio
10-11222 · 2011-03-23
Appeal (appellants (defendants Isabelino Valarezo-Orobio and Gerardo Palomino-Moreno)) Denied

“We also hold that the district court did not err in applying an eight-level enhancement to Valarezo's sentence, pursuant to 2X7.2(b)(1)(C) of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. We, therefore, affirm the district court's orders in all respects.”

United States v. Register
11-12773 · 2012-05-04
Appeal (appellant (defendant Stuart M. Register)) Granted

“Accordingly, we vacate Register's sentence and remand for resentencing.”

Haynes v. McCalla Raymer, LLC
14-14036 · 2015-07-13
Appeal (appellants (plaintiffs Joan and Troy Wayne Haynes)) Denied

“After thorough review, we affirm.”

Put Judge Marcus's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Marcus actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Marcus's own signed orders and cites them.