Robert J. Luck

How Judge Luck rules, drawn from 30 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Position
Circuit judge
Appointed by
Donald Trump (Republican)
Commissioned
November 19, 2019
ABA rating
Well Qualified
Education
University of Florida (B.A., economics, highest honors, 2000); University of Florida Levin College of Law (J.D., magna cum laude, Order of the Coif, 2004)
Signed orders read
30

About Judge Luck

Robert Joshua Luck is a judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Appointed by President Donald J. Trump, Judge Luck received a commission on November 19, 2019.

Judge Luck's practices and standing orders

The court's website lists no individual practices or standing orders of Judge Luck's own (checked October 11, 2026), so the court's local rules and general orders are the place to look (court page ↗).

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 11, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Luck decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In Fox’s hotel-fee class action, Luck held that a court could infer the jurisdictional amount from the complaint but could not supply missing facts through speculation.

“The district court can make common-sense inferences about the jurisdictional amount from the face of the complaint, but it cannot speculate or hypothesize about facts that are not in the record.”

In Hamrick’s delivery-driver arbitration appeal, Luck evaluated the transportation-worker exemption by the drivers’ own work, rather than the earlier route taken by the goods.

“Section one is directed at what the class of workers is engaged in, and not what it is carrying.”

In Del Castillo’s licensing appeal, Luck held that one surviving independent rationale of an earlier panel decision remained binding after a later Supreme Court ruling.

“And it takes only one valid basis or rationale for a prior holding to make it binding precedent.”

Procedural preferences

In B.G.G., Luck held that the district court should have presumed the prosecutor’s Rule 48(a) dismissal request was made in good faith.

“The district court must presume that the government moved to dismiss the information in good faith.”

In Khatabi’s Title VII damages appeal, Luck held that the dealership waived the employee-headcount cap after failing to raise it before trial.

“Because the dealership waived the benefit of Title VII’s $50,000 damages cap, it was error for the district court to apply that cap to reduce Khatabi’s sex-discrimination damages to $181,028.”

Cautions

In BenShot’s Subchapter V bankruptcy appeal, Luck dissented from applying the specified nondischargeability exceptions to a corporate debtor’s nonconsensual plan. The panel majority adopted the opposite reading.

“Because these courts have the best reading of the bankruptcy code, I respectfully dissent.”

In Green and Chambers, Luck would have vacated the restitution award for a deceased victim’s father’s lost wages while attending court. He read the pre-amendment statute as withholding authority for that payment; the majority affirmed.

“Because the district court exceeded its authority, I would vacate that part of the restitution award. Otherwise, I would affirm the defendants’ convictions and sentences.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Michael Stephen Martinez
18-12950 · 2020-07-14
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

United States v. Shusta Traverse Gumbs
18-13182 · 2020-07-15
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

Tommy L. Mosley, Jr. v. Lt. Towanda Zachery
17-14631 · 2020-07-24
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

Michael Fox v. The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, LLC
19-10361 · 2020-09-29
Appeal (appellant) Granted in part

“AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED for further proceedings.”

Donald Burns v. Town of Palm Beach
18-14515 · 2021-06-08
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“We affirm the district court’s summary judgment for the town in all respects. AFFIRMED.”

Curtis Hamrick v. Partsfleet, LLC
19-13339 · 2021-06-22
Appeal (appellant) Granted in part

“REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART WITH INSTRUCTIONS and DISMISSED IN PART.”

Hector Hernandez v. Plastipak Packaging, Inc.
19-12655 · 2021-10-13
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.”

Alan H. Ginsburg v. United States
19-11836 · 2021-10-26
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

Heather Kokesch Del Castillo v. Secretary, Florida Department of Health
19-13070 · 2022-02-18
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

S.S. v. Cobb County School District
21-11048 · 2022-08-05
Appeal (appellant) Moot / procedural

“APPEAL DISMISSED.”

William E. Henry v. Attorney General, State of Alabama
21-11483 · 2022-08-18
Appeal (appellant) Granted in part

“AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.”

United States v. B.G.G.
21-10165 · 2022-11-22
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“VACATED AND REMANDED.”

Draft for Judge Luck with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Luck, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Luck's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace