Lewis Render Morgan

How Judge Morgan rules, drawn from 25 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Morgan no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled here.

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Position
Circuit judge
Status
Deceased
Served
1968–2001
Appointed by
Lyndon B. Johnson (Democratic)
Commissioned
July 25, 1968
Education
University of Georgia School of Law, LL.B. (1935)
Signed orders read
25

About Judge Morgan

Lewis Render Morgan was a judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Appointed by President Lyndon B. Johnson, Judge Morgan was commissioned to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on July 25, 1968 and reassigned to this court on October 1, 1981. Judge Morgan previously served on the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, commissioned there on August 10, 1961. Judge Morgan served until death on November 15, 2001.

How Judge Morgan decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Morgan treated prior resolution of the same legal issues between the same parties as a strong reason to foreclose relitigation even though the later dispute involved a different transaction.

“The same parties, issues, arguments, and law were involved in an earlier suit which has been decided. We can think of no reason to repeat the process.”

He required defense strategy to rest on a reasonably diligent investigation, particularly when the proposed defense depended on the defendant's medical history.

“The error in this argument is that Mauldin’s attorney failed to conduct a legally sufficient investigation which would allow him to make such a strategy decision.”

Procedural preferences

Morgan declined to invalidate a policy in the abstract when the evidentiary record instead showed that the government had failed to justify applying it to the litigants before the court.

“The board simply produced insufficient evidence to justify its application in this case.”

Cautions

He would not attribute private misconduct to the government for suppression purposes without evidence of government knowledge or participation.

“Without such proof, the fifth amendment does not authorize the suppression of these depositions.”

Morgan checked an agency's characterization of testimony against the record and rejected a finding that the cited testimony did not support.

“This simply is not true.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Cox
· 1981-12-18
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

United States v. Stout
· 1982-02-16
Appeal (appellants) Granted in part

“The convictions are accordingly AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED IN PART.”

McHenry v. Bond
· 1982-02-22
Petition for review (petitioner) Granted in part

“AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART.”

Grand Faloon Tavern, Inc. v. Wicker
· 1982-03-15
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

United States v. Timmons
· 1982-04-12
Appeal (appellants) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

Dills v. City of Marietta
· 1982-05-06
Appeal (appellants) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

Herring v. Securities & Exchange Commission
· 1982-04-19
Petition for review (petitioners) Denied

“ORDER ENFORCED.”

Faser v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
· 1982-04-30
Appeal (appellants) Granted in part

“AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.”

Slocum v. Georgia State Board of Pardons & Paroles
· 1982-06-14
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

Multitex Corp. v. Dickinson
· 1982-08-23
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

Ferguson v. United States
· 1983-03-07
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

United States v. Greenman
· 1983-03-25
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Not applicable to this circuit-court record.

A historical record

Judge Morgan no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled here. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.