Julie E. Carnes

How Judge Carnes rules, drawn from 29 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Position
circuit
Appointed by
Barack Obama (Democratic)
Commissioned
2014-07-31
Education
University of Georgia (A.B., 1972); University of Georgia School of Law (J.D., 1975)
Signed orders read
29

How Judge Carnes decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

She distinguishes lawful efforts to collect an unenforceable debt from misleading communications, treating the creditor's ability to request voluntary payment as no license to obscure the debt's legal status.

“Nevertheless, a right to seek repayment does not confer a right to mislead.”

In accommodation cases she requires the employee to identify a reasonable measure that would permit performance of the job; an unsupported request for indefinite light duty does not satisfy that burden.

“Moreover, Plaintiff has failed to identify any reasonable accommodation that would have allowed her to return to full duty within the time required by SOP 213.00.”

She enforces an insurance policy's consent requirement and does not shift litigation expenses the insured chose to incur before notifying the carrier.

“In fact, provisions of the policy make clear that Travelers was not obligated to pay any expenses that its insured incurred in litigating a covered claim unless the insured had first obtained Travelers’ consent to generate those expenses.”

Procedural preferences

At summary judgment she allows objective video evidence to displace testimony when the recording conclusively contradicts the witness's account.

“the surveillance video conclusively rebuts such testimony.”

She treats administrative exhaustion and preservation as jurisdictional limits in immigration review and does not reach theories that were not presented below.

“we lack jurisdiction to review claims by an alien that the latter has failed to exhaust or preserve.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Pruco Life Insurance Company v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
13-12135; 13-15859 · 2015-02-27
Appeal (appellants (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Pruco Life Insurance Co.)) Moot / procedural

“QUESTIONS CERTIFIED.”

United States v. Elliot Rivera
13-13125 · 2015-03-12
Appeal (appellant (defendant Elliot Rivera)) Denied

“convictions are AFFIRMED.”

Carlos Zelaya v. United States
13-14780 · 2015-03-30
Appeal (appellants (plaintiffs Carlos Zelaya and George Glantz)) Denied

“For the above reasons, we AFFIRM the district court’s dismissal of Plaintiffs’ claims.”

Richard Moss v. City of Pembroke Pines
14-11240 · 2015-03-31
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Richard Moss)) Denied

“Therefore, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.”

United States v. George R. Cavallo
12-15660; 13-12009 · 2015-06-22
Appeal (appellants (defendants George Cavallo, Hornberger, and Streinz)) Granted in part

“AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, VACATED and REMANDED in part, with instructions.”

James Ryan Singletary v. Juan Vargas
14-14424 · 2015-10-29
Appeal (appellant (defendant Deputy Juan Vargas)) Granted

“Accordingly, we REVERSE the order of the district court denying his motion for summary judgment and direct that court to enter judgment consistent with this opinion.”

United States v. Fausto Aguero Alvarado
13-14843 · 2015-12-11
Appeal (appellant (defendant Fausto Aguero Alvarado)) Denied

“For all the above reasons, we affirm Defendant’s conviction and sentence. AFFIRMED.”

Yasmick Jeune v. U.S. Attorney General
13-11683 · 2016-01-08
Petition for review (petitioner (Yasmick Jeune)) Denied

“PETITION DISMISSED IN PART, DENIED IN PART.”

Delores Frazier-White v. David Gee
15-12119 · 2016-04-07
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Delores Frazier-White)) Denied

“we affirm.”

United States v. Robert William Green
14-12830 · 2016-11-30
Appeal (appellant (defendant Robert William Green)) Denied

“For the reasons stated above, we AFFIRM Defendant’s conviction and sentence.”

Embroidme.com, Inc. v. Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
. · 2017-01-09
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff-insured EmbroidMe.com, Inc.)) Denied

“We therefore AFFIRM the district court.”

United States v. Freeman Eugene Jockisch
. · 2017-05-26
Appeal (appellant (defendant Freeman Jockisch)) Denied

“we therefore AFFIRM Defendant’s conviction.”

Draft for Judge Carnes with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Carnes, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Carnes's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace