Emmett Ripley Cox

How Judge Cox rules, drawn from 33 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Cox no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled here.

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Position
Circuit judge
Status
Deceased
Served
1988–2021
Appointed by
Ronald Reagan (Republican)
Commissioned
April 18, 1988
Education
University of Alabama (A.B., 1957); University of Alabama School of Law (LL.B., 1959)
Signed orders read
33

About Judge Cox

Emmett Ripley Cox was a judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Appointed by President Ronald Reagan, Judge Cox received a commission on April 18, 1988. Judge Cox previously served on the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama, commissioned there on November 18, 1981. Judge Cox assumed senior status on December 18, 2000 and served until death on March 3, 2021.

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Atlanta Gas Light Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
No. 93-9278 · 1995-10-20
Appeal (appellant) Moot / procedural

“For the foregoing reasons, we VACATE the district court's entry of summary judgment for all insurers who are parties to this appeal and REMAND to the district court with instructions to DISMISS the action as to the parties to this appeal for want of jurisdiction.”

Johnson v. City of Fort Lauderdale
No. 96-4052 · 1997-05-30
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“we affirm the district court's order denying the defendants' motion to dismiss”

Burke v. United States
No. 97-3013 · 1998-09-03
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“We thus hold that a claim that the sentence imposed is contrary to a post-sentencing clarifying amendment is a non-constitutional issue that does not provide a basis for collateral relief in the absence of a complete miscarriage of justice.”

American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Tison Hog Market, Inc.
No. 98-8506 · 1999-08-03
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, the district court’s judgment is vacated, and we remand this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Davis v. Carl Cannon Chevrolet-Olds, Inc.
No. 98-6489 · 1999-07-26
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, we vacate the district court’s denial of the motion to remand and remand the case for further proceedings.”

Robbins v. Koger Properties, Inc.
Nos. 95-2882, 95-3069 · 1997-07-14
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“The district court held that plaintiffs offered sufficient proof of loss causation to support their Rule 10b-5 claim. We reverse and render judgment in favor of Deloitte and Touche.”

Mederos v. United States
No. 99-11024 · 2000-07-17
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s March 10, 1999 order dismissing Mederos’s second § 2255 motion and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

United States v. Kapelushnik
Nos. 01-14114, 01-14115 · 2002-09-17
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“We therefore vacate Kapelushnik's and Volis's sentences and remand for the imposition of new sentences without such departures.”

Williams v. Best Buy Co.
No. 00-11829 · 2001-10-18
Appeal (appellant) Moot / procedural

“Accordingly, this case is remanded to the district court for the limited purposes of developing the record and making findings of fact with regard to the amount in controversy at the time of removal.”

Patrick v. Floyd Medical Center
No. 98-9542 · 2000-01-26
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“We affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment on the ground that Patrick has failed to establish sufficient state action to support a § 1983 claim.”

United States v. Smith
No. 07-13202 · 2008-06-30
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“We affirm his convictions and sentences.”

Sterling Financial Investment Group, Inc. v. Hammer
No. 03-15745 · 2004-12-16
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The order of the district court is, therefore, affirmed.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Circuit judges do not carry a trial caseload; not enumerated.

A historical record

Judge Cox no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled here. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.