Charles Reginald Wilson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit circuit Appointed by Bill Clinton (Democratic) 27 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

York Insurance Co. v. Williams Seafood of Albany, Inc.
99-13724 · 2001-04-18
Appeal (appellant (Williams Seafood et al.)) Granted

“It follows that the district court's grant of a declaratory judgment to York absolving York of liability for Williams's loss was in error. Accordingly, we REVERSE the district court's grant of a declaratory judgment, and REMAND for further proceedings. REVERSED and REMANDED.”

Lepone-Dempsey v. Carroll County Commissioners
06-14042 · 2007-02-02
Appeal (appellants (plaintiffs Tina Lepone-Dempsey and Shannon Alexander)) Granted

“The district court's decision to dismiss this case without prejudice for failure to timely effect service was premature ... Therefore, we reverse the order of the district court and remand the case for reconsideration in light of this opinion. REVERSED and REMANDED.”

United States v. Mock
06-15861 · 2008-04-14
Appeal (appellant (defendant Christopher Mock)) Granted in part

“We affirm Mock's conviction, but vacate and remand his sentence because the district court's findings were inadequate to support application of 2A2.1(a)(1). ... AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART”

Winschel v. Commissioner of Social Security
10-10620 · 2011-01-24
Appeal (appellant (claimant Michael Winschel)) Granted

“Because the ALJ asked the vocational expert a hypothetical question that failed to include or otherwise implicitly account for all of Winschel's impairments, the vocational expert's testimony is not 'substantial evidence' and cannot support the ALJ's conclusion ... Accordingly, we reverse. ... REVERSED and REMANDED.”

Mulhall v. UNITE HERE Local 355
10-15797 · 2012-01-18
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Martin Mulhall)) Granted

“We hold that organizing assistance can be a thing of value that, if demanded or given as payment, could constitute a violation of 302. Because the dismissal of Martin Mulhall's complaint was based on a contrary conclusion, we reverse. ... REVERSED AND REMANDED.”

Toro v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
12-10311 · 2013-02-04
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Aracelys Toro)) Denied

“We agree with the district court that the CAA's plain language bars Toro's self-petition, and we also find that a rational basis exists for treating battered aliens differently based on the immigration status of their Cuban spouses. Therefore, we affirm the district court's dismissal of Toro's complaint. ... AFFIRMED.”

United States v. Hall
12-11343 · 2013-04-16
Appeal (appellant (defendant Derrick Hall)) Denied

“We hold that possession of an unregistered sawed-off shotgun qualifies as a 'crime of violence' under the Sentencing Guidelines, and we affirm Hall's sentence. AFFIRMED.”

United States v. Jimenez
11-15039 · 2013-01-25
Appeal (appellant (defendant Michael Jimenez)) Granted

“We agree with Jimenez that no reasonable construction of the evidence presented at trial permits a finding that he intentionally misapplied funds. Therefore, we reverse his conviction.”

Garcia v. GEICO General Insurance Co.
13-15788 · 2015-08-19
Appeal (appellant (defendant GEICO General Insurance Co.)) Granted

“After careful consideration of the parties' briefs and the records, we agree with GEICO and vacate the final judgment and remand.”

United States v. Nagel
15-14087 · 2016-09-01
Appeal (appellant (defendant Jay Nagel)) Denied

“we determine that Nagel's sentence is both procedurally and substantively sound. ... Accordingly, we affirm the district court.”

Doe v. Miami-Dade County
15-14336 · 2017-01-25
Appeal (appellants (plaintiffs John Doe #1, #2, #3, and Florida Action Committee)) Granted in part

“At this stage, we conclude that Doe #1 and Doe #3 have alleged plausible ex post facto challenges to the residency restriction. Therefore, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Ela v. Destefano
16-11548 · 2017-08-30
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Theresa Ela)) Granted in part

“We affirm the award of $2,500 in liquidated damages. ... Because we hold that the district court erred in calculating Ela's attorneys' fees award, we reverse and remand for reconsideration. ... AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.”

Put Judge Wilson's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Wilson actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Wilson's own signed orders and cites them.