Britt Cagle Grant

How Judge Grant rules, drawn from 54 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Position
circuit
Appointed by
Donald J. Trump (Republican)
Commissioned
2018-08-03
Education
Wake Forest University (B.A., summa cum laude, 2000); Stanford Law School (J.D., with distinction, 2007)
Signed orders read
54

How Judge Grant decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A retaliation theory required evidence that the decisionmaker knew of the protected complaint; suspicious timing and speculation could not fill that evidentiary gap.

“Because speculation about her boss’s knowledge cannot make up for the missing evidence, we affirm.”

When the parties committed employment disputes to arbitration, a possible legal error did not permit the district court to substitute its judgment for the arbitrators' decision.

“Citi does not get a mulligan in federal court because it identifies a possible legal error in arbitration.”

She applied statutory language to new communications technology without adding a personal-solicitation limitation absent from the text.

“Solicitation has long occurred through mass communications, and online videos are merely a new way of doing an old thing.”

Procedural preferences

At summary judgment she requires courts to draw reasonable inferences and resolve reasonable doubts in favor of the nonmoving party.

“In making this determination, we view the evidence, draw all reasonable factual inferences, and resolve all reasonable doubts”

Appellate finality cannot be manufactured by using Rule 41(a) to dismiss one count rather than the entire action; without a final judgment, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

“Because the parties here attempted to use Rule 41(a) to dismiss a single count and not an entire lawsuit, a final judgment was never rendered.”

In a concurrence, she declined to decide a broader substantial-compliance question once full compliance independently resolved the immigration petition.

“I would save it for another day.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Al-Rayes v. Willingham
18-11059 · 2019-02-05
Appeal (appellants (creditors Abdullah Al-Rayes et al.)) Granted

“Because the district court applied a heightened standard for association-in-fact enterprises consisting of married couples when it granted summary judgment in Erika's favor, we must reverse that order. ... REVERSED, VACATED, AND REMANDED.”

United States v. Bankston
18-14812 · 2019-12-23
Appeal (appellant (defendant Ronald Bankston)) Granted

“The district court thus committed plain error by applying the two-level increase for use of body armor in the commission of a drug trafficking offense. We vacate Bankston's sentence and remand for resentencing without the body-armor enhancement. VACATED AND REMANDED.”

L.J. v. School Board of Broward County
17-14237 · 2019-06-26
Appeal (appellants (a student, L.J., and his mother)) Denied

“Because the content outlined in a properly designed IEP is a proxy for the IDEA's educational guarantee, we conclude that a material deviation from that plan violates the statute. Applying that standard to this case, we do not see a material deviation from L.J.'s IEP, and therefore affirm the judgment of the district court.”

Knight v. Florida Department of Corrections
18-13390 · 2019-08-30
Appeal (appellant (petitioner Richard Knight)) Denied

“Because Hurst does not apply retroactively to Knight, any challenge to his death sentence on that basis is beyond our reach on federal habeas review. Nor can Knight find success in his other challenge ... We therefore affirm.”

AA Suncoast Chiropractic Clinic, P.A. v. Progressive American Insurance Co.
17-13003 · 2019-09-12
Appeal (appellants (defendants Progressive insurers)) Granted

“And because an injunction is not the right remedy, Rule 23(b)(2) is not the right path to class certification ... REVERSED AND REMANDED.”

Bourdon v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
17-15787 · 2019-10-03
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Douglas Bourdon)) Denied

“We affirm; courts lack jurisdiction to review either the process or the outcome of the no-risk decision.”

Gordon v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
18-15243 · 2020-03-10
Appeal (appellant (Chapter 7 Trustee Neil Gordon)) Denied

“The grant of summary judgment is AFFIRMED. The motion to certify a question of state law to the Georgia Supreme Court is DENIED.”

James v. Warden, Holman Correctional Facility
17-11855 · 2020-04-28
Appeal (appellant (petitioner Joe Nathan James)) Denied

“we conclude that the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals reasonably applied Strickland v. Washington ... because he has failed to show a reasonable probability that his counsel's performance affected the outcome of his sentencing proceeding. We therefore affirm.”

Martin v. Financial Asset Management Systems, Inc.
17-14488 · 2020-05-14
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Belinda Martin)) Denied

“Because speculation about her boss's knowledge cannot make up for the missing evidence, we affirm.”

United States v. Clotaire
17-15287 · 2020-06-30
Appeal (appellant (defendant Mikel Clotaire)) Denied

“We affirm his convictions.”

United States v. Harris
18-15055 · 2020-07-01
Appeal (appellant (defendant Olando Harris)) Denied

“That means Harris has not shown that his sentence is procedurally or substantively unreasonable, so we affirm the district court's judgment. AFFIRMED.”

United States v. Melgen
18-10991 · 2020-07-31
Appeal (appellant (defendant Salomon Melgen)) Denied

“We affirm the district court's judgment in all respects.”

Draft for Judge Grant with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Grant, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Grant's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace