Andrew L. Brasher

How Judge Brasher rules, drawn from 54 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Position
circuit
Appointed by
Donald Trump (Republican)
Commissioned
2020-06-30
Education
Samford University (B.A., summa cum laude, 2002); Harvard Law School (J.D., cum laude, 2006)
Signed orders read
54

How Judge Brasher decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

When a statute, regulation, and governing instrument enumerate the operative rules, he declines to add equitable defenses that those texts do not recognize.

“We hold that these defenses are foreclosed by the statute and regulation that govern the Form I-864 affidavit, as well as the text of the affidavit itself.”

A plaintiff cannot manufacture Article III injury by voluntarily spending time and money to correct information that was never disclosed or otherwise caused concrete harm.

“a plaintiff cannot manufacture standing by spending time and money to rectify an otherwise harmless statutory violation.”

He treats material lies or reckless omissions used to obtain an arrest warrant as a Fourth Amendment problem and evaluates probable cause using a corrected account.

“When a police officer intentionally lies or recklessly misleads a judge to obtain an arrest warrant, the resulting arrest violates the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.”

In Johnson, the court required consideration of the full evidence of investment imprudence rather than treating an identical comparator as indispensable.

“Although comparator evidence may be relevant to establish loss causation, we cannot say it is always nec- essary.”

Procedural preferences

A Rule 12(b)(6) motion tests whether a claim is stated, not whether the pleading is artful; ambiguity is ordinarily addressed through a motion for a more definite statement.

“A 12(b)(6) motion, however, ‘is not designed to correct inartistic pleadings.’”

Intervention after denial of class certification did not create an immediately appealable decision where no final merits judgment existed.

“Curlee’s appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.”

In Russo, an Appointments Clause defect in unused council powers did not justify vacating a rule independently promulgated by the Secretary.

“Because the Secretary ex- ercised the authority to promulgate the regulation independent of any authority of the Council, the Appointments Clause does not justify invalidating the gag grouper rule.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Christopher Teasley v. Warden, Macon State Prison
19-12224 · 2020-11-03
Appeal (appellant (the Warden of Macon State Prison / the State)) Granted

“Teasley is not entitled to habeas relief. Accordingly, we REVERSE the judgment of the district court.”

Jerome Williams v. United States
19-10308 · 2021-01-13
Appeal (appellant (Jerome Williams, 28 U.S.C. 2255 movant)) Denied

“Because the district court did not err in denying Williams's motion, the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.”

Richard Michael Morris v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
18-14802 · 2021-03-25
Appeal (appellant (Richard Morris, state prisoner / habeas petitioner)) Granted

“REVERSED AND REMANDED.”

Paul Martin Sullivan, Jr. v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
19-13974 · 2021-04-06
Appeal (appellant (Paul Sullivan, plaintiff's counsel, sanctioned personally)) Granted

“REVERSED, VACATED, AND REMANDED.”

Leroy Mack v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company
19-14958 · 2021-04-22
Appeal (appellant (Leroy Mack, putative-class plaintiff)) Moot / procedural

“we therefore VACATE the district court's order of dismissal and REMAND to the district court with instructions for the district court to remand the unsettled claims to the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Florida.”

MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC v. The Hanover Insurance Company
19-12029 · 2021-04-30
Appeal (appellant (MSP Recovery Claims and affiliates, plaintiffs)) Denied

“we DISMISS the cross-appeals for lack of jurisdiction and AFFIRM the orders denying MSP's motions for attorney's fees and costs.”

Mary Jo Bradley v. Officer Casey Benton
20-11509 · 2021-08-26
Appeal (appellant (Officer Casey Benton, defendant asserting qualified immunity)) Granted in part

“AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.”

Valentin Belevich v. Klavdia Thomas
19-14668 · 2021-11-01
Appeal (appellants (Klavdia Thomas and Tatiana Kuznitsnyna, immigration sponsors / defendants)) Denied

“We hold that these defenses are foreclosed by the statute and regulation that govern the Form I-864 affidavit, as well as the text of the affidavit itself. Accordingly, we affirm.”

United States v. Bruce Mitchell Nicholson
19-11669 · 2022-01-24
Appeal (appellant (Bruce Nicholson, defendant)) Denied

“Nicholson's conviction is AFFIRMED.”

Joan Simring v. GreenSky, LLC
21-11913 · 2022-03-28
Appeal (appellant (GreenSky, LLC, defendant)) Granted

“REVERSED and REMANDED.”

Raniero Gimeno v. NCHMD, Inc.
21-11833 · 2022-06-28
Appeal (appellant (Raniero Gimeno, plaintiff)) Granted

“We REVERSE and REMAND to allow Gimeno to bring a claim for breach of fiduciary duty under Section 1132(a)(3).”

Lalitha E. Jacob, MD v. Mentor Worldwide, LLC
20-10132 · 2022-07-20
Appeal (appellant (Lalitha Jacob, pro se plaintiff)) Granted

“we REVERSE the district court's dismissal of Jacob's complaint and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Draft for Judge Brasher with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Brasher, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Brasher's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace