Wade Brorby

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit circuit Appointed by Ronald Reagan (Republican) 37 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Allen v. United States (C.I.R.)
68 F.3d 483 · 1995-10-17
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff)) Denied

“The judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado is AFFIRMED.”

Stanley v. Callahan
124 F.3d 217 · 1997-09-03
Appeal (appellant (claimant)) Denied

“We AFFIRM the judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma for substantially the same reasons stated in the order of the magistrate judge, a copy thereof being attached hereto.”

United States v. Anderson
133 F.3d 933 · 1998-01-12
Appeal (appellant (defendant)) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, Mr. Anderson’s appeal fails and the district court’s decision is AFFIRMED.”

Lane v. Nye
149 F.3d 1190 · 1998-06-19
Appeal (appellant (petitioner)) Denied

“Consequently, we DENY Mr. Lane's application for a certificate of appealability because he has failed to make a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right," 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), and DISMISS his appeal.”

Reynolds v. Apfel
161 F.3d 18 · 1998-09-15
Appeal (appellant (claimant)) Denied

“The judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma upholding the Commissioner's denial of benefits is, therefore, AFFIRMED.”

Migneault v. Peck
· 2000-02-25
Appeal (appellant (state university)) Granted

“We therefore REVERSE the district court’s denial of Eleventh Amendment immunity to the University and remand for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the United States Supreme Court.”

Wilcox v. Peterson
· 2002-04-12
Appeal (appellant (petitioner)) Denied

“For these reasons, we AFFIRM the district court’s order of dismissal, and DISMISS Mr. Wilcox’s appeal.”

United States v. Cook
· 2002-04-12
Appeal (appellant (defendant)) Denied

“For these reasons, we deny Mr. Cook’s motion for a certificate of appealability and DISMISS his appeal.”

Waeckerle v. Oklahoma
· 2002-04-12
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff)) Denied

“Therefore we AFFIRM the district court’s order dismissing Mr. Waeckerle’s action.”

Harmon v. Calbone
· 2002-04-19
Appeal (appellant (petitioner)) Denied

“For this reason, Mr. Harmon’s application for a certificate of appealability is denied and his appeal is DISMISSED.”

United States v. Harvey
· 2005-04-01
Appeal (appellant (defendant)) Moot / procedural

“Thus, for the reasons articulated herein, and for substantially the same reasons set forth in the district court’s September 10, 2004 order, we DENY Mr. Harvey’s request for a certificate of appealability, DENY his request to proceed in forma pauperis, and DISMISS his appeal.”

Crandall v. Bowersox
· 2005-05-16
Appeal (appellant (petitioner)) Denied

“Thus, for the foregoing reasons, we DENY Mr. Crandall’s request for a certificate of appealability and DISMISS his appeal.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Circuit judges do not carry a trial caseload; not enumerated.

Put Judge Brorby's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Brorby actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Brorby's own signed orders and cites them.