Stephanie Kulp Seymour

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit circuit Retired 2025 · served 1979–2025 Appointed by Jimmy Carter (Democratic) 28 signed orders read

Judge Seymour no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Armando Mendez
18-1259 · 2019-05-17
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“We affirm.”

United States v. Merle Denezpi
19-1213 · 2020-10-28
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“We affirm.”

United States v. David Lawless
20-1173 · 2020-11-02
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Mr. Lawless appeals his sentence as procedurally and substantively unreasonable, and we affirm.”

United States v. Karen Lynn McClaflin
18-1217 · 2019-09-20
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“We affirm.”

United States v. Shayne Kyle Armajo
21-8021 · 2022-06-23
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Consequently, we hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion when it excluded the contested evidence. AFFIRMED.”

Kenney v. Helix TCS, Inc.
18-1105 · 2019-09-20
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The district court denied Helix's motion to dismiss. We affirm.”

United States v. Jeremy Gilmore
15-3114 · 2016-11-15
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm.”

Hackford v. State of Utah
15-4120 · 2017-01-19
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“He appeals, and we affirm.”

United States v. Leroya Cozad
20-3233 · 2022-01-03
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“Because the district court abused its discretion, we vacate Ms. Cozad's sentence and remand for resentencing.”

United States v. Julian Manzano
23-6073 · 2024-08-13
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“Because Oklahoma second-degree murder does not categorically match generic “murder” under the Guidelines, we reverse.”

United States v. Christopher Kee
23-2189 · 2025-02-27
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“Accordingly, exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we vacate Mr. Kee's conviction and sentence and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

United States v. Jonas Dalveyon Tyler
24-6035 · 2025-06-16
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“Accordingly, exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we vacate Mr. Tyler's conviction and sentence and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Circuit judges do not carry a trial caseload; not enumerated.

A historical record

Judge Seymour no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.