Robert Hugh McWilliams Jr.

How Judge McWilliams rules, drawn from 28 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge McWilliams no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Position
circuit
Status
Deceased
Served
1970–2013
Appointed by
Richard Nixon (Republican)
Commissioned
1970-10-14
Education
University of Denver, A.B., 1938; University of Denver (Sturm College of Law), LL.B., 1941
Signed orders read
28

How Judge McWilliams decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Will adopt a well-reasoned out-of-circuit decision as the correct analysis of an open question rather than writing on a blank slate.

“In our view, the correct analysis of the present issue is set forth in Webber v. Credithrift of America, Inc., 674 F.2d 796 (9th Cir.1982)”

Statutory interpretation began with the enacted words as the primary dispositive source.

“In construing and applying a statute, ‘the primary dispositive source of information is the wording of the statute itself.’”

A payment obligation arising when a consumer obtained goods with a dishonored check qualified as a debt under the federal collection statute.

“Under the ‘plain meaning’ test, it would seem to us that a ‘debt’ is created where one obtain goods and gives a dishonored check in return therefor.”

Procedural preferences

On clear-error review, the question was not whether the appellate court would have made the same factual findings.

“Whether this court would have made such findings is not the issue. We are not the fact finder.”

A three-judge panel treated an earlier panel's judgment as binding and left reconsideration to the en banc court or Supreme Court.

“a three-judge panel of this Court cannot overrule the judgment of another panel of this Court.”

Cautions

Employment claims premised on a firing failed when the plaintiff did not make a sufficient showing that the employer had discharged her.

“Scott did not make a sufficient showing that she was ‘fired’ by Wal-Mart.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Household Finance Co.
· 1983-05-16
Appeal (appellant-United-States) Granted

“Judgment reversed and cases remanded for further proceedings consonant with this opinion.”

United States v. Perry
· 1983-06-10
Appeal (defendant-appellant) Denied

“Judgment affirmed.”

Rustad v. United States Air Force
· 1983-09-28
Appeal (plaintiff-appellant) Denied

“Judgment affirmed.”

Dennison v. Topeka Chambers Industrial Development Corp.
· 1984-01-04
Appeal (plaintiff-appellant) Denied

“Judgment affirmed.”

Zahourek v. Arthur Young and Co.
· 1984-12-19
Appeal (plaintiff-appellant) Denied

“Judgment affirmed.”

Schaeffer v. Wagner
· 1985-06-19
Appeal (plaintiff-appellant) Denied

“Judgment affirmed.”

Smith v. United States
· 1987-04-30
Appeal (plaintiff-appellant) Denied

“Judgment affirmed.”

United States v. Daniels
· 1988-09-23
Appeal (defendant-appellant) Denied

“JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.”

Asarco, Inc. v. Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
· 1989-03-03
Appeal (petitioner-appellant) Denied

“Decision affirmed.”

United States v. Hunt
· 1989-06-12
Appeal (defendant-appellant) Denied

“Judgment affirmed.”

Ebert v. Lamar Truck Plaza
· 1989-06-23
Appeal (plaintiff-appellant) Denied

“Judgment affirmed.”

United States v. Morrow
· 1991-04-02
Appeal (defendant-appellant) Denied

“Judgment affirmed.”

A historical record

Judge McWilliams no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.