Michael W. McConnell

How Judge McConnell rules, drawn from 34 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge McConnell no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Position
circuit
Status
Resigned
Served
2002–2009
Appointed by
George W. Bush (Republican)
Commissioned
2002-11-26
Education
Michigan State University, B.A., 1976; University of Chicago Law School, J.D., 1979
Signed orders read
34

How Judge McConnell decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Railroad operations were not enough by themselves to make every state or local rule governing maintenance or its byproducts federally preempted.

“we do not agree that any state or local regulation of such maintenance or disposal of maintenance byproducts is necessarily preempted.”

Internet use facilitated travel for a sentencing enhancement when it made an illicit trip easier by connecting the defendant with people he believed could supply victims.

“Thus, the question is whether Mr. McGraw’s use of the internet made it easier for him to go on his illicit ‘fantasy tour.’”

Procedural preferences

At the motion-to-dismiss stage, the court evaluated the complaint's legal sufficiency rather than the evidentiary truth of its allegations.

“on a motion to dismiss we evaluate the legal, not the factual, basis of the complaint.”

An argument not considered or ruled upon by the district court was not addressed on appeal.

“Since [this] claim was not considered or ruled upon by the district court, we will not address it on appeal.”

Cautions

A plaintiff's subjective feeling that a statute chilled conduct did not establish standing without an objectively supported threat or other concrete injury.

“His unsupported claims of a subjective ‘chill’ are therefore insufficient to support standing.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Ashby v. McKenna
· 2003-06-11
Appeal (plaintiff-appellant) Granted in part

“is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings”

Teaford v. Ford Motor Company
· 2003-08-11
Appeal (movant-appellant) Moot / procedural

“The appeal is DISMISSED.”

United States v. Cordova
· 2003-08-12
Appeal (appellant-United-States) Granted

“we VACATE the district court’s sentence and REMAND”

Pajarito Plateau Homesteaders, Inc. v. United States
· 2003-10-08
Appeal (plaintiff-appellant) Denied

“The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.”

United States v. McGraw
· 2003-12-02
Appeal (defendant-appellant) Denied

“Accordingly, we AFFIRM Mr. McGraw’s sentence.”

United States v. Jimenez-Alcala
· 2003-12-23
Appeal (defendant-appellant) Denied

“We affirm the district court.”

Santana v. City of Tulsa
· 2004-02-25
Appeal (plaintiff-appellant) Denied

“The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.”

Pierce v. Gilchrist
· 2004-03-02
Appeal (defendants-appellants) Denied

“we AFFIRM the district court’s denial of”

D.L.S. v. State of Utah
· 2004-07-07
Appeal (plaintiff-appellant) Denied

“we AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.”

Crutchfield v. Countrywide Home Loans
· 2004-11-24
Appeal (plaintiff-appellant) Moot / procedural

“the appeal is DISMISSED for want of”

United States v. Sandoval
· 2004-12-08
Appeal (defendant-appellant) Denied

“We therefore AFFIRM.”

Team Tires Plus, Ltd. v. Tires Plus, Inc.
· 2005-01-06
Appeal (plaintiff-appellant) Granted

“we REVERSE the district court’s grant of”

A historical record

Judge McConnell no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.