John Carbone Porfilio

How Judge Porfilio rules, drawn from 29 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Porfilio no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Position
circuit
Status
No longer serving
Appointed by
Ronald Reagan (Republican)
Commissioned
1985-05-10
Education
University of Denver (B.A., 1956); University of Denver College of Law (LL.B., 1959)
Signed orders read
29

How Judge Porfilio decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A void tax assessment prevented administrative collection but did not bar a civil action or proof of claim for the underlying tax liability.

“While the absence of an assessment prevents the IRS from administratively collecting the tax, it may still file a civil action, which is the functional equivalent to filing a proof of claim in a bankruptcy proceeding.”

The responsible agency's interpretation of its own salary-basis regulation controlled unless plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation.

“Because the salary-basis test is a creature of the Secretary’s own regulations, his interpretation of it is, under our jurisprudence, controlling unless ‘plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation.’”

Procedural preferences

A dismissal for failure to prosecute was reviewed for abuse of discretion and upheld after the appellant failed to comply with court orders.

“We review the district court's dismissal for failure to prosecute for abuse of discretion.”

At step four of Social Security disability analysis, the claimant retained the burden of proving disability.

“At step four, claimant retains the burden of proof to show that he is disabled.”

Cautions

A different or negligent medical diagnosis did not by itself establish an Eighth Amendment violation.

“Even if an independent examination yielded a different diagnosis, negligent diagnosis does not rise to a constitutional violation under the Eighth Amendment.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Goldston (Goldston v. United States)
· 1997-01-06
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“We agree with these conclusions and affirm.”

United States v. Graves
· 1997-02-11
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“For the reasons stated below, we affirm.”

United States v. Cisneros-Cabrera
· 1997-04-09
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“We affirm the judgment of the district court.”

United States v. Furman
· 1997-05-15
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“we affirm the dismissal of this action notwithstanding the district court's mistaken reliance on the new rule and the government’s consequent concession of reversible error.”

Thompson v. Limke
· 1997-05-27
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“We therefore AFFIRM substantially for the reasons given by the district court.”

Carpenter v. City & County of Denver
· 1997-06-05
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Consequently, under Auer, we affirm the order of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of the City.”

Nichols v. Reno
· 1997-09-30
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“We agree with that decision and affirm the judgment.”

Taylor v. Jaquez
· 1997-10-10
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“We therefore AFFIRM the order dismissing the action based on Younger abstention.”

Horne v. Romer
133 F.3d 932 · 1998-01-13
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The dismissal was not erroneous because no justiciable controversy remained to be litigated.”

In re Oaks (Oaks v. Zeman)
134 F.3d 383 · 1998-01-28
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.”

Cragg v. City of Osawatomie
· 1998-05-07
Appeal (appellant) Granted in part

“REVERSED in part, AFFIRMED in part.”

In re Straight (Wyoming Department of Transportation v. Straight)
· 1998-06-09
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“its judgment is AFFIRMED on that ground alone.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Circuit judges review appeals rather than manage a federal trial docket, so trial-court caseload and motion-timing metrics do not apply.

A historical record

Judge Porfilio no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.