Allison H. Eid

How Judge Eid rules, drawn from 42 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Position
Circuit judge
Appointed by
Donald Trump (Republican)
Commissioned
November 3, 2017
Education
Stanford University (A.B., American studies, with distinction, 1987); University of Chicago Law School (J.D., with high honors, 1991)
Signed orders read
42

About Judge Eid

Allison Hartwell Eid is a judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. Appointed by President Donald J. Trump, Judge Eid received a commission on November 3, 2017.

Judge Eid's practices and standing orders

The court's website lists no individual practices or standing orders of Judge Eid's own (checked October 11, 2026), so the court's local rules and general orders are the place to look (court page ↗).

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 11, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Eid decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In a dispute over a regulation, she declined to import limitations from its preamble that did not appear in the operative language.

“the limitations that appear in the preamble do not appear in the language of the regulation, and we refuse to engraft those limitations onto the language.”

In a statutory-interpretation case, she held that “all information” included the defendant’s mens rea.

“The phrase ‘all information’ means ‘all information,’ and that includes a defendant's mens rea.”

In her Liberty Global rehearing dissent, Eid would treat relevance as a meaningful threshold under the codified economic-substance doctrine and determine it from the doctrine’s common-law application.

“I would interpret § 7701(o) to require a meaningful threshold relevancy determination, and I would make this determination by examining how courts have applied the economic substance doctrine under the common law.”

Procedural preferences

In a qualified-immunity appeal, she applied the requirement that clearly established law be particularized to the facts of the case.

“the clearly established law must be ‘particularized’ to the facts of the case.”

In an arbitration dispute, she held that a court had to decide whether an arbitration agreement was formed in the first instance.

“the issue of whether an arbitration agreement is formed in the first instance must be determined by the court”

In her dissent in Abedi v. Carter, Eid concluded that the petitioner’s release from immigration detention mooted his appeal because he had not shown a reasonable expectation of being detained again.

“Abedi’s release from immigration detention mooted his appeal, and Abedi has not shown that the exception for wrongs capable of repetition yet evading review applies.”

Cautions

In an appeal about expired grazing permits, the court held that the plaintiff lacked standing because relief could not redress the alleged harm. The court did not reach the recusal issue or the merits.

“Therefore, Western Watersheds Project lacks standing.”

In this appeal, she held that parties could not contract around the doctrine at issue.

“we cannot allow parties to contract around that doctrine.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Olea-Monarez
· 2018-11-07
Appeal (appellant (Vicencio Olea-Monarez, criminal defendant)) Denied

“For the reasons stated above, we AFFIRM Olea-Monarez’s conviction on Count 8 of the indictment.”

JGE ex rel. Tasso v. United States
· 2019-04-26
Appeal (appellants (JGE and family, Federal Tort Claims Act plaintiffs)) Denied

“We affirm the district court's order denying plaintiffs' Rule 59(e) motion.”

Peabody Twentymile Mining, LLC v. Secretary of Labor
· 2019-07-18
Petition for review (petitioner (Peabody Twentymile Mining, LLC)) Granted

“we GRANT the petition for review, REVERSE the decision of the ALJ, and VACATE the citation.”

Coddington v. Sharp
· 2020-05-12
Appeal (appellant (James Coddington, habeas petitioner)) Denied

“For the reasons set forth above, we AFFIRM the district court's denial of Coddington's petition for habeas relief.”

Millard v. Rankin
· 2020-08-20
Appeal (appellant (State of Colorado; Director of the Colorado Bureau of Investigation)) Granted

“we REVERSE the district court's judgment on the Eighth Amendment and substantive due process claims and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Fedor v. United Healthcare, Inc.
· 2020-09-16
Appeal (appellant (Dana Fedor)) Granted

“We VACATE the district court's judgment compelling arbitration and REMAND for the district court to determine if Fedor and UHC formed the 2016 arbitration agreement.”

Banner Bank v. Smith
· 2022-02-07
Appeal (appellant (Banner Bank)) Granted

“For the reasons above, we REVERSE the district court’s award of attorneys’ fees under § 78B-5-825 and REMAND for further proceedings.”

United States v. Logsdon
· 2022-02-28
Appeal (appellant (Julieann Logsdon, criminal defendant)) Denied

“For the reasons stated above, we AFFIRM the district court's application of the arson cross-reference to Logsdon's sentence.”

Chegup v. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation
· 2022-03-18
Appeal (appellants (temporarily banished tribal members)) Moot / procedural

“Respect for tribal sovereignty required that, before the court below decided this complex and difficult question about the scope of ICRA habeas, the banished members must have either exhausted their tribal remedies or met the heavy burden of demonstrating why they had not.”

Heard v. Dulayev
· 2022-03-29
Appeal (appellant (Officer Greg Dulayev)) Granted

“we reverse the district court's denial of summary judgment as to Dulayev and remand with instructions to grant Dulayev qualified immunity and enter judgment in Dulayev's favor.”

United States v. Chavez
· 2022-03-29
Appeal (appellant (United States)) Granted

“We REVERSE the district court's dismissal of counts 5 and 6 of the indictment and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Western Watersheds Project v. Interior Board of Land Appeals
· 2023-03-20
Appeal (appellant (Western Watersheds Project)) Denied

“We AFFIRM the district court's dismissal of this case for lack of Article III standing.”

Draft for Judge Eid with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Eid, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Eid's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace