Alfred Paul Murrah

How Judge Murrah rules, drawn from 34 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Murrah no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Position
circuit
Status
Deceased
Served
1940–1975
Appointed by
Franklin D. Roosevelt (Democratic)
Commissioned
1940-09-04
Education
University of Oklahoma College of Law, LL.B., 1928
Signed orders read
34

How Judge Murrah decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

The right to counsel in an involuntary commitment proceeding warranted retroactive protection because its absence threatened the integrity of a process taking liberty.

“In our case the fundamental right to counsel is involved and failure to have counsel at every step of the proceedings may result in indefinite and oblivious confinement and work shameful injustice.”

A workers' compensation insurer's liability and available defenses were coextensive with those of its insured employer.

“As to that, its liability is exactly commensurate with that of its insured.”

Procedural preferences

The appeal period ran from entry of judgment rather than notice, leaving prospective appellants responsible for monitoring the action.

“that time starts to run from the date of entry of judgment and not from the date of notice of the entry.”

An amendment increasing claimed damages was allowed in the interest of justice when it did not change the negligence cause of action.

“Rule 15 (a), F.R.C.P. 28 U.S.C.A., provides that amendments should be freely allowed in the interest of justice.”

Cautions

A witness's prior conviction and equivocal statement went to credibility and weight for the jury rather than automatic exclusion.

“In our system of jurisprudence the jury is the sole and best judge of factual contentions and whom to believe.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Rogers v. United States
· 1942-07-14
Appeal (defendant-appellant) Denied

“The judgment is affirmed.”

MacDonald v. Hudspeth
· 1942-01-12
Habeas petition (petitioner-appellant) Denied

“the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.”

Baker v. Hunter
· 1944-05-10
Habeas petition (petitioner-appellant) Denied

“The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.”

Farris v. Hunter
· 1944-07-05
Habeas petition (petitioner-appellant) Denied

“The judgment of the trial court is accordingly affirmed.”

Mosher v. Hunter
· 1944-07-03
Habeas petition (petitioner-appellant) Denied

“The judgment is affirmed.”

Mitchell v. United States
· 1944-05-04
Appeal (defendant-appellant) Denied

“The order denying motion to vacate is affirmed.”

McMahan v. Hunter
· 1945-07-21
Habeas petition (petitioner-appellant) Denied

“the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.”

Blood v. Hunter
· 1945-06-25
Habeas petition (petitioner-appellant) Denied

“The judgment is therefore affirmed.”

De Jordan v. Hudspeth
· 1943-08-27
Habeas petition (petitioner-appellant) Moot / procedural

“The appeal should be dismissed.”

Gillespie v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
· 1945-10-29
Appeal (taxpayer-appellant) Denied

“The judgment is affirmed.”

Garbutt v. Blanding Mines Co.
· 1945-11-05
Appeal (plaintiff-appellant) Denied

“the judgment is therefore affirmed.”

United States v. 1851 Cartons of Frosted Fish
· 1945-01-08
Appeal (appellant-United-States) Granted

“the judgment of the trial court is reversed.”

A historical record

Judge Murrah no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.