Levin Hicks Campbell

How Judge Campbell rules, drawn from 38 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Campbell no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Position
circuit
Status
No longer serving
Appointed by
Richard M. Nixon (Republican)
Commissioned
1972-06-30
Education
Harvard College (A.B., 1948); Harvard Law School (LL.B., 1951)
Signed orders read
38

How Judge Campbell decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

He enforces commercial filing rules as written when third parties rely on the public record. The hardship caused by filing in the wrong place does not justify an equitable exception that would make statutory perfection requirements unreliable.

“Efforts by courts to fashion equitable solutions to mitigate the hardship on particular creditors of literal application of statutory filing requirements would have the deleterious effect of undermining the reliance which can be placed upon them.”

FLSA exemption analysis turns on employees' actual work rather than their managerial titles. For willfulness, evidence that the employer knew or had reason to know the Act applied supports use of the longer limitations period.

“The test for willfulness is whether the employer knew or had reason to know that the FLSA was applicable to its employment practices.”

Procedural preferences

In reviewing a bankruptcy sale, he balances confidence in the regularity of judicial auctions against the estate's interest in avoiding a grossly inadequate price. Reopening bidding is reserved for genuinely close cases, not merely a chance to collect a few extra dollars.

“The bankruptcy court must be accorded sufficient discretion to decide the truly close cases as best it can in view of these competing considerations.”

Cautions

A service-of-process defense must be raised in the first responsive Rule 12 filing. Filing an answer and other motions without asserting it waives the defense and submits the defendant to personal jurisdiction.

“The Rules provide that the defense of insufficiency of service of process is waived if omitted from a motion to dismiss, and may not be raised thereafter.”

An ineffective-assistance claim not presented to the trial court generally should not be developed for the first time on direct appeal. The appropriate course is to preserve the claim for a collateral proceeding where the factual record can be examined.

“Since the claim cannot be considered now on direct appeal and since there is no other assignment of error, we affirm defendant’s conviction without prejudice to any right he may have to raise the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel in a proceeding brought pursuant to section 2255.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Chester J. Broderick v. Robert J. Di Grazia
· 1974-10-25
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Affirmed.”

United States v. Stanley J. Biscoe
· 1975-05-23
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Affirmed.”

Sumner Darman, Trustee, Sentron, Inc. v. Metropolitan Alarm Corp.
· 1976-01-23
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Affirmed.”

Bruce Gavin v. Paul Chernoff; Terry O. Jarvi v. Larry R. Meachum; Roscoe Owen Heathman v. Larry R. Meachum
· 1976-12-30
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Affirmed.”

Dora Pila, Administratrix v. G. R. Leasing and Rental Corporation
· 1977-04-06
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“Dismissal of the complaint for lack of jurisdiction over Leasing was improper, and the complaint against it must be reinstated.”

Efrain Lagares Martinez v. Leonardo Rivera Rodriguez
· 1977-04-14
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Affirmed.”

Uniroyal, Inc. v. Universal Tire & Auto Supply Co.
· 1977-06-20
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Affirmed.”

John T. Martin v. Rudolph H. Desilva
· 1977-12-19
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Affirmed.”

National Labor Relations Board v. Blue Hills Cemetery, Inc.
· 1977-12-27
Petition for review (petitioner) Denied

“Enforcement granted.”

International Union, UAW and Its Local 899 v. Atlas Tack Corporation
· 1979-01-15
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Affirmed.”

In re Muscongus Bay Company (Appeal of Anthony Abbotoni)
597 F.2d 11 · 1979-04-30
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Affirmed.”

Rafael Perez v. Marine Transport Lines, Inc.
· 1979-10-03
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Affirmed.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Circuit judges review appeals rather than manage a federal trial docket, so trial-court caseload and motion-timing metrics do not apply.

A historical record

Judge Campbell no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.