Bailey Aldrich

How Judge Aldrich rules, drawn from 28 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Aldrich no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled here.

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Position
Circuit judge
Status
Deceased
Served
1959–2002
Appointed by
Dwight D. Eisenhower (Republican)
Commissioned
September 10, 1959
Education
Harvard University (AB); Harvard Law School (LLB)
Signed orders read
28

About Judge Aldrich

Bailey Aldrich was a judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. Appointed by President Dwight D. Eisenhower, Judge Aldrich received a commission on September 10, 1959. Judge Aldrich previously served on the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, commissioned there on April 27, 1954. Judge Aldrich assumed senior status on August 31, 1972 and served until death on September 25, 2002.

How Judge Aldrich decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In a racing injury suit, treats the promoter and affiliated association as one operation for summary judgment purposes where their activities were intertwined.

“While Monarch was, strictly, a separate corporation, the enterprise as a whole was a single one, combined in time, activity, and purpose.”

Procedural preferences

When a conviction was vacated, evaluates pretrial bail through the statutory presumption favoring release and the facts bearing on appearance, including time already served.

“Determination of what is needed ‘reasonably [to] assure’ defendant’s appearance, not considerations of state comity, controls the setting of bail under the Bail Reform Act.”

Cautions

Requires a record basis for broad labor injunctions that cover other employers or unions; a single offense alone did not justify that reach.

“An injunction broader than the need is not only contrary to all established equitable principles, but it is peculiarly inappropriate in the sensitive area of labor relations where abuses formerly rampant under broadly and vaguely worded decrees are legendary.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

National Labor Relations Board v. Ochoa Fertilizer Corp.
· 1960-10-18
Petition for review (petitioner) Granted in part

“Orders and decrees will be entered in conformity with this opinion.”

Boston Edison Company v. Campanella & Cardi Construction Company
· 1959-11-30
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“Judgment will be entered vacating the judgment of the District Court and remanding the case to that court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.”

Alexander L. Del Santo, Jr. v. Bristol County Stadium, Inc.
· 1960-01-08
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“Judgment will enter vacating the judgment of the District Court and remanding the case to that court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.”

Unistrut Corporation v. James F. Power, James F. Power v. Unistrut Corporation
· 1960-06-30
Appeal (appellant) Granted in part

“Judgment will be entered vacating the judgment of the District Court with respect to infringement of Patent No. 2,-345,650, and affirming the judgment in all other respects, except as to counsel fees.”

Paul C. Gebhard v. Royce Aluminum Corporation
· 1961-12-15
Appeal (appellant) Granted in part

“Therefore, although the direction of judgment under Rule 50(b) was error, the verdict is not reinstated. Plaintiff is entitled to a new trial, limited to the issues discussed in the preceding paragraph.”

Edward D. Pratt, Jr. v. United States of America
· 1964-12-28
Appeal (appellant) Granted in part

“Judgment will be entered vacating the judgment of the district court insofar as it granted summary judgment against appellant on his second and third causes of action and dismissed said counts, but otherwise affirming the judgment of the district court.”

National Labor Relations Board v. Patrick F. Izzi, D/B/A Pat Izzi Trucking Co.
· 1965-04-12
Petition for review (petitioner) Denied

“A decree will be entered enforcing the order of the Board.”

Sylvania Electric Products, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
· 1966-04-05
Petition for review (petitioner) Denied

“The order of the Board will be enforced.”

National Labor Relations Board v. Freeport Marble & Tile Co., Inc.
· 1966-10-18
Petition for review (petitioner) Granted in part

“A decree of enforcement will be entered to the extent hereinabove stated.”

Felix Benitez Rexach v. United States
· 1968-03-11
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“It is sufficient that the government’s stem from its de jure relationship without regard to the subjective quid pro quo in any particular case. We will not hold that assessment of benefits is a prerequisite to assessment of taxes.”

Michael Pasquarella v. Vincent Santos
· 1969-10-06
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“The order of the District Court is reversed and the action remanded for further proceedings.”

United States v. Gerald Trainor
· 1970-03-24
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“With no evidence of Frank Howard’s existence, nothing is to be gained by a new trial, except a free shot. We see no basis for imposing that penalty.”

A historical record

Judge Aldrich no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled here. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.