Susan Webber Wright

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas district Appointed by George H. W. Bush (Republican) 21 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

McWhirter v. Ramsey
2:12-cv-00199-SWW · 2014-04-14
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendant Ramsey's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docs. 62) is GRANTED, and the cruel and unusual punishment claim raised against her is DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, while the retaliation claim raised against her is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendant Horn, Hopkins, and Cowell's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docs. 65) is GRANTED, and all claims raised against them are DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE.”

Thomas v. Ryals
4:17-cv-00661-SWW-JTK · 2018-09-17
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendants= Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 32) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff=s Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice.”

King v. Lindsey Management Co.
4:07-cv-01081-SWW · 2008-08-22
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“The Court denies Lindsey's motion to dismiss the amended complaint. ... IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Lindsey's motion to dismiss [docket entry106] is denied”

Motion to amend (plaintiff) Denied

“The Court denies plaintiff's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(e), which provides that a copy of the amended complaint must be attached to the motion to amend.”

Hentz v. Shinseki
4:12-cv-00112-SWW · 2012-07-24
Voluntary dismissal (plaintiff) Granted

“The Court finds plaintiff's motion to dismiss with prejudice [docket entry 10] should be and is hereby granted. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Moot / procedural

“Because the Court dismisses plaintiff's complaint with prejudice and does not retain jurisdiction, defendants' motion [docket entry 7] is moot.”

Wofford v. Holladay
4:16-cv-00143 · 2017-02-17
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 47) is GRANTED and this cause of action is dismissed with prejudice.”

Garren v. Mize
4:05-cv-00912 · 2006-05-11
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant's motion for summary judgment [docket entry 46] is hereby denied.”

Clark v. Veneman
3:04-cv-00275 · 2005-11-07
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendant's motion for summary judgment (docket entry #8) is GRANTED. Pursuant to the judgment entered together with this order, this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

Duncan v. Arkansas Department of Community Correction
2:05-cv-00233 · 2008-01-18
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendants' motion for summary judgment (docket entry #24) is GRANTED. There being no issues remaining for trial, pursuant to the judgment entered together with this order, this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

Smith v. Pulaski County Special School District
4:16-cv-00574 · 2017-02-28
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendant's motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 13] is GRANTED. Pursuant to the judgment entered together with this order, this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

Whiten v. Stuttgart Regional Medical Center
5:07-cv-00026 · 2008-01-28
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment is granted. Plaintiff's state law claim of outrage is dismissed without prejudice. Her remaining claims are dismissed with prejudice.”

Brewer v. McCann
3:10-cv-00245 · 2012-01-05
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“The motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant Debra McMullin (docket entry #60) is GRANTED, Plaintiff's claims against McMullin are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and McMullin's name is removed as a party Defendant.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“The motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants John Smith, Jeremy Sparks, and Rick Webb (docket entry #63) is GRANTED.”

Guest v. Craighead County Sheriff's Department
3:04-cv-00290 · 2005-07-18
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the City defendants' motion for summary judgment should be and hereby is granted in its entirety”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“the County defendants' motion for summary judgment should be and hereby is granted in part and denied in part. This action will proceed against Craighead County Sheriff Deputies Jared Bassham, Ron Richardson, and Leon Johnson in their individual capacities only and solely on plaintiff's claim of excessive force.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Felony criminal cases run roughly 1.7-2.4 years to termination; pro se prisoner/FTCA screening and §2255 dockets often terminate within days to a few months. Small recency sample; not a representative distribution.

Put Judge Wright's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Wright actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Wright's own signed orders and cites them.