Mary Davies Scott

How Judge Scott rules, drawn from 21 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Scott no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas
Position
bankruptcy
Status
No longer serving
Education
Trinity University, B.A., 1968; University of Arkansas School of Law, J.D., 1978
Signed orders read
21

How Judge Scott decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A dismissal request failed when the stipulated record did not establish enough facts to support a legal finding of bad faith.

“The stipulation of the parties is insufficient for the Court to determine as a matter of law that this case was filed in bad faith”

Procedural preferences

Injunctive relief had to be requested through an adversary complaint rather than by motion.

“the debtor may not obtain an injunction by motion, the motion must be denied.”

Cautions

The court disregarded factual assertions appearing only in briefing rather than evidence.

“Arguments or assertions by counsel in a brief are not evidence and must be disregarded in the determination of this motion.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Martin
· 2001-10-02
Motion for relief or reconsideration (the debtor) Denied

“The Motion for Relief and Reconsideration of this Court’s 3-13-98 Order, filed on September 21, 2001, is denied.”

Motion for injunction (the debtor) Denied

“The debtor’s Emergency Motion for Injunction of this Court’s 3-13-98 Order, filed on September 24, 2001, is denied.”

In re Bradberry
· 1998-04-06
Motion to reinstate case (the debtor) Granted

“the Debtor’s Motion for Reinstatement, filed on April 2, 1998, is GRANTED”

Boyd v. Department of Veterans Affairs (In re Boyd)
· 1998-06-18
Summary judgment (the United States) Granted

“the Motion for Summary Judgment, filed on April 9, 1998, by the United States is granted.”

Kidd v. Driver Control Section, Department of Finance and Administration (In re Kidd)
· 1998-08-27
Motions to dismiss (the defendants) Granted in part

“the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss filed on April 17, 1998, is Granted as to the defendant Driver Control Section Department of Finance & Administration and Denied as to the defendant Mike Munns.”

In re McCord
· 1998-04-06
Motion for relief from stay (Supershine Floor Maintenance) Granted

“Supershine Floor Maintenance’s ‘Petition to Relax Stay’ filed on January 28,1998, is GRANTED.”

Jones v. First Fidelity Acceptance Corp. (In re Jones)
· 1999-01-19
Summary judgment (First Fidelity Acceptance Corporation) Granted

“First Fidelity Acceptance Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment, filed on December 4, 1998, is GRANTED.”

In re Cloninger
· 1997-05-29
Motion to reopen (John J. Hamilton III) Denied

“John J. Hamilton, Ill’s, Motion to Reopen Chapter 7 Petition, filed on December 9,1996, is DENIED.”

Motion for sanctions (the debtor) Denied

“The debtor’s Motion for Sanctions, filed on or about December 16, 1997, is DENIED.”

Hutchins v. Fordyce Bank & Trust Co. (In re Hutchins)
· 1997-07-17
Motions to compel (the debtor) Granted

“the plaintiffs Motion to Compel Discovery filed on January 28, 1997, to which the plaintiff responded on March, 12, 1997, is GRANTED.”

Sonat Exploration Co. v. Arkansas Oil & Gas, Inc. (In re Arkansas Oil & Gas, Inc.)
· 1997-06-10
Motion to abstain (Sonat Exploration Company) Granted

“Plaintiffs ‘Motion to Abstain from Determination of Counterclaim or, in the Alternative, to Stay Proceedings on the Counterclaim,’ filed on April 15,1997, is GRANTED.”

Hutchins v. Fordyce Bank & Trust Co. (In re Hutchins)
· 1997-07-11
Motion for leave to reply (the defendants) Granted

“The defendants’ ‘Motion for Opportunity to reply to Plaintiffs Response to Defendants’ Objection to Plaintiffs Right to Trial by Jury on Count I and II of the Plaintiffs Complaint,’ filed on May 30, 1997, is GRANTED.”

Motion to strike jury demand (the defendants) Granted

“The Plaintiffs jury demand is Stricken.”

Motion to strike jury demand (the plaintiff) Granted

“The defendant’s jury demand is Stricken.”

In re Ussery
· 2001-04-12
Objection to plan confirmation (the creditor) Denied

“the objection to the debtor’s chapter 13 plan, filed on March 9, 2001, and amended on March 22, 2001, is Overruled.”

United States v. Bryant (In re Bryant)
· 2000-05-12
Summary judgment (the United States) Granted

“the United States Motion for Summary Judgment, filed on April 27, 2000, is granted.”

A historical record

Judge Scott no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.