James G. Mixon

How Judge Mixon rules, drawn from 9 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Mixon no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas
Position
bankruptcy
Status
Deceased
Commissioned
1984-03-24
Education
University of Central Arkansas; University of Arkansas School of Law, J.D., 1968
Signed orders read
9

How Judge Mixon decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A fiduciary-duty theory required identifiable entrusted property rather than general relationships or business expectations.

“people, relationships, and efforts do not make a valid res for purposes of § 523(a)(4).”

Procedural preferences

An exemption objector retained the burden of proof and lost when the evidence was evenly balanced.

“with the evidence evenly persuasive he has not sustained his burden of proof.”

Cautions

A recorded instrument could not supply constructive notice when identifying the land required speculation beyond the record.

“Linking the mortgaged property to the deed would be speculative.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Clear Sky Properties, LLC v. Roussel (In re Roussel)
· 2012-12-03
Nondischargeability claim (Clear Sky Properties, LLC) Granted

“pursuant to § 523(a)(4), $1,480.00 is nondischargeable.”

Nondischargeability claim (Clear Sky Properties, LLC) Denied

“the jury award for breach of fiduciary duty regarding past and future lost revenue in the amount of $184,683.60 and the award to Deere for breach of fiduciary duty in the amount of $58,800.00 is dischargeable pursuant to § 523(a)(4).”

Nondischargeability claim (Luanne Deere) Denied

“the award to Deere for breach of fiduciary duty in the amount of $58,800.00 is dischargeable pursuant to § 523(a)(4).”

Nondischargeability claim (the plaintiffs) Denied

“the award of punitive damages in the amount of $113,886.40 is dischargeable.”

Nondischargeability claim (the plaintiffs) Denied

“the fees and costs awarded by the state court in the amount of $87,523.25 are dischargea-ble.”

Caine v. First State Bank (In re Caine)
· 2011-12-08
Lien avoidance claim (the debtors in possession) Granted

“the debtor-in-possession qualifies as a bona fide purchaser and can avoid the mortgage lien.”

Mortgage reformation counterclaim (First State Bank) Denied

“The Bank is not entitled to reformation.”

Request for attorney fees (the debtors in possession) Denied

“the Court finds that the Debtors are not entitled to attorneys’ fees.”

In re Kelley
· 2011-08-16
Objection to personal property exemption (the Chapter 7 trustee) Granted

“the statutory exemptions are unconstitutional and disallowed.”

Objection to homestead exemption (the Chapter 7 trustee) Denied

“The objection to the Debtor’s homestead as being urban is overruled and the homestead is determined to be rural.”

In re Cameron
· 2011-05-17
Objection to proof of claim (the debtors) Granted

“The objection to the proof of claim is sustained and the claim is disallowed.”

Request for attorney fees (the debtors) Denied

“Accordingly, attorneys’ fees are not appropriate.”

Smith v. Cooper (In re Cooper)
· 2009-01-13
Objection to discharge (the plaintiffs and trustee) Granted

“The Debtor Stanley Cooper’s discharge has been denied for violation of 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(4) and 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(5)”

Objection to discharge (the plaintiffs) Denied

“the Plaintiffs’ objection to the discharge of Mrs. Cooper pursuant to section 727(a)(5) is overruled.”

Nondischargeability claim (the plaintiffs) Moot / procedural

“the Court abstains, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334(c)(1), from considering the allegations under the subsections that are cited above”

Hamilton v. Hamilton (In re Hamilton)
· 2008-06-16
Nondischargeability claim (Nancy Hamilton) Granted

“Judgment for the Plaintiff for willful and malicious injury to the Plaintiffs horses and horse tack in the sum of $40,840.00”

Nondischargeability claim (Nancy Hamilton) Denied

“Judgment for the Debtor on the Plaintiffs claim for damages in the sum of $76,000.00 for the proposed horse breeding business”

Nondischargeability claim (Nancy Hamilton) Granted in part

“Judgment for the Plaintiff for the value of the computer, movies and games in the sum of $3,000.00; judgment for Debtor on all other items of personal property”

Nondischargeability claim (Nancy Hamilton) Denied

“Judgment for the Debtor on the Plaintiffs complaint to determine dis-chargeability pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A)”

Objection to discharge (Nancy Hamilton) Granted

“Judgment for the Plaintiff denying the Debtor’s discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(4).”

In re Gjestvang and In re Fleischauer
· 2009-05-18
Request for attorney fees (Terri Lynne Gjestvang) Denied

“The Court finds, based on the above reasoning, that the award of attorney’s fees is not appropriate.”

Request for attorney fees (Georgia Ann Fleischauer) Denied
Sims v. Roggasch (In re Roggasch)
· 2013-06-12
Nondischargeability claim (Tasha and John Sims) Denied

“The Plaintiffs have not proven by a preponderance of the evidence that the alleged misrepresentations were made and relied on by Sims causing her damage that resulted in the claim she seeks to have determined nondischargeable.”

Objection to discharge (Tasha and John Sims) Granted

“the Debtor’s discharge is denied pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(2)(A).”

McGraw v. Collier (In re Collier)
· 2013-09-03
Nondischargeability claim (Nancy McGraw and Pfeifer Sutter Family LLC) Denied

“the Plaintiffs have failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the obligations allegedly owed to them by the Debtor are nondis-chargeable as debts incurred by fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, willful and malicious conduct, or violations of security law.”

Request for attorney fees (Nancy McGraw and Pfeifer Sutter Family LLC) Denied

“The Plaintiffs’ request for attorney’s fees and costs is denied.”

A historical record

Judge Mixon no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.