Charles W. Baker

How Judge Baker rules, drawn from 13 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Baker no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas
Position
bankruptcy
Status
Retired 1984
Served
1973–1984
Commissioned
1973-03-01
Education
University of Missouri, B.A., 1962; University of Missouri School of Law, J.D., 1965
Signed orders read
13

How Judge Baker decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

The court applied the recovery statute's text literally despite contrary equitable arguments favoring an initial transferee.

“This Court, however, refuses to overlook the unambiguous language of 11 U.S.C. § 550(a)(1):”

Procedural preferences

A party seeking a venue change bore the burden of justifying it, while the court retained the matter in the interest of justice and convenience.

“the burden of proof in such matters lies on the movant seeking the change of venue”

Cautions

The court declined to add payment requirements to Chapter 13 through an undefined good-faith standard.

“Caution tempers this Court not to create payment requirements to creditors when Congress has already said what payments are required.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Williams
· 1982-05-19
Motion to quash employer withholding order (State Boat Corporation) Denied

“Accordingly, the Motion of State Boat is overruled”

In re Sadler
Bankruptcy No. LR 80 50 B · 1980-04-09
Objection to plan good faith (Sears, Roebuck and Co.) Denied

“An Order overruling the objection of Sears and confirming the debtor’s Plan is entered contemporaneously herewith.”

Request to confirm chapter 13 plan (the debtor) Granted
In re Gillion
Bankruptcy No. LR 82-113 · 1983-07-21
Motion to dismiss bankruptcy case (the debtor) Denied

“Accordingly the case should be converted to a Chapter 7 proceeding.”

Motion to convert to chapter 7 (the Chapter 13 trustee) Granted
Lawrence v. Commissioner (In re Lawrence)
Adv. No. 81-332; LR 80-28 · 1981-08-24
Request for tax setoff (the Internal Revenue Service) Granted in part

“The debts may properly be off-set.”

Motion for turnover (the debtor) Granted in part

“Accordingly, judgment should be entered against the defendant in the amount of $1,651.98 plus interest”

In re Sutherland
Bankruptcy No. FA 79 118 B · 1980-02-29
Objection to plan liquidation value (Hillcrest Lumber Company) Denied

“Therefore, the second objection of Hillcrest is overruled.”

Objection to plan unfair discrimination (Hillcrest Lumber Company) Denied

“Hillcrest’s objection on the basis of unfair discrimination against Class 6 is overruled.”

Request to confirm chapter 13 plan (the debtors) Granted

“The debtors’ plan will be confirmed by separate Order.”

Lindsey v. Morgan (In re Cox Cotton Co.)
Bankruptcy Nos. JO 80-154, JO 80-155 · 1981-02-09
Motion to quash (the defendants) Denied

“the defendants’ motion must necessarily be, and hereby is, denied.”

In re Thebeau
Bankruptcy No. J 79 152 B · 1980-04-11
Objection to plan good faith (the Chapter 13 trustee) Denied

“the Trustee’s objection to confirmation of Plan should be and the same is hereby overruled”

Request to confirm chapter 13 plan (the debtors) Granted

“the Chapter 13 plan of Ronald W. and Mary L. Thebeau is confirmed.”

Bragg's Electric Construction Co. v. Rebsamen Companies (In re Bragg's Electric Construction Co.)
Bankruptcy Nos. LR 80-382; AP 80-175; LR JO 80-153-JO 80-155 · 1980-10-17
Secured status claim (Rebsamen Companies and Premium Financing Specialists) Denied

“payments on a debt which is unsecured by any lien on ‘property’ of the debtors.”

In re Covey
No. HS 83-013 · 1984-01-19
Objection to exemption (the trustee) Denied

“The Court holds that the Worker’s Compensation benefits which were received by the Debtor prior to the filing of the Petition for Relief under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code and were segregated from other assets are exempt from payment to unsecured creditors.”

Wilson v. Internal Revenue Service (In re Wilson)
Bankruptcy No. ED 80-061; Adv. No. AP 81-537 · 1982-01-08
Request for tax setoff (the Internal Revenue Service) Granted in part

“the defendant, Department of Treasury, should, pursuant to § 553, be allowed to offset against the tax refund due the debtor the pro-rata share of the refund, $439.49”

Motion for turnover (the debtors) Granted in part

“the remaining amount, $56.51, should be remitted forthwith to plaintiffs.”

Tenney v. Terry (In re Terry)
Bankruptcy No. HS 79 83 B · 1980-02-22
Objection to chapter 13 eligibility (the Chapter 13 trustee) Denied

“The debtors’ income meets this test and, therefore, the debtor is eligible for relief under Chapter 13”

Objection to plan good faith (the Chapter 13 trustee) Denied

“the Court finds that there is no requirement that a plan under Chapter 13 propose a payment to creditors in order to be in good faith”

Request to confirm chapter 13 plan (the debtors) Granted

“the Objection to confirmation by the trustee is overruled and the debtors’ plan is confirmed.”

Mixon v. Mid-Continent Systems, Inc. (In re Big Three Transportation, Inc.)
Bankruptcy No. FA 80-114; Adv. No. AP 82-164 · 1983-11-18
Motion for directed verdict (Ronnie D. Sleeth) Granted

“a Motion for Directed Verdict was granted, without objection from the Trustee as to Defendant Ronnie D. Sleeth.”

Motion to dismiss adversary claims (E. Sidney Groves) Granted

“the Complaint is dismissed without prejudice as to him.”

Preference recovery claim (the trustee) Granted

“the Court hereby enters judgment for the Trustee in the amount of $129,181 against Mid-Continent Systems, Inc. and Lehman Blackshear.”

A historical record

Judge Baker no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.