William A. Scanland

How Judge Scanland rules, drawn from 12 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Scanland no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona
Position
bankruptcy
Status
No longer serving
Signed orders read
12

How Judge Scanland decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

The petition-date rule controlled the amount of the homestead exemption available to the debtors.

“the Debtor should be allowed the homestead of $20,000.00, the amount allowed by the Arizona state statute on the date of filing the petition in bankruptcy.”

Procedural preferences

A postpetition recording did not violate the stay where the forfeiture had already become effective before filing.

“the failure to record the Declaration of the Affidavit of Termination of Forfeiture before the filing of the Petition in Bankruptcy does not affect the validity of the forfeiture of the plaintiffs’ interest.”

Cautions

Professional compensation depends on reasonably necessary work rather than raw time alone.

“Hours alone are a false criteria that can result in the reward of inexperience, inefficiency and incompetence.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Rogers
82-00032 · 1982-11-03
Objection to retirement plan exemption (Lester W. Lee) Denied

“the benefits due the debtors under the ERISA plan of his employer are not property of the estate as of the day of filing this petition.”

Perry v. Lyon
· 1980-10-31
Claim to ownership of artifact (Robert Ward) Granted

“the Court finds that the Defendant Robert Ward is the owner of the shield”

Claim to half interest in artifact (LeRoy and Jacqueline Holubar) Denied

“no other party to this action has any interest in it.”

Claim to interest in artifact (Phil Holstein) Denied

“his default was duly entered against him foreclosing any claim he might make to the shield.”

In re Pajarito American Indian Art, Inc.
· 1981-05-28
Application for referee fund compensation (Referee’s Salary and Expense Fund) Granted

“Referee’s Salary and Expense Fund, $12,-835.71.”

Application for receiver compensation (receiver) Granted

“Receiver, $8,678.54; expenses of $369.70.”

Application for trustee compensation (trustee) Granted

“Trustee, $6,013.08; expenses of $698.40.”

Application for court reporter compensation (court reporter) Granted

“Court Reporter, $2,740.00.”

Application for accountant compensation (accountant) Granted

“Accountant, $726.95.”

Application for receiver counsel compensation (receiver’s counsel) Granted in part

“this Court allows the attorneys for the Receiver $2,638.50”

Application for trustee counsel compensation (trustee’s counsel) Granted in part

“while acting as attorney for the Trustee, $7,490.00 and costs in the amount of $167.60.”

Application for debtor counsel compensation (debtor’s counsel) Granted in part

“the attorney should be paid the balance of $5,750.00, and the Trustee is authorized to pay this sum.”

Application to dispose of books and records (trustee) Granted

“The Trustee’s application for authorization to offer the books and records to the Bankrupts, if refused by them to Internal Revenue Service, if refused by them then to be destroyed, is allowed”

Simpson v. Mayers
80-0080 · 1980-10-22
Request to determine real estate forfeiture invalid (debtors) Denied

“the forfeiture of buyers’ interest in the contract for sale of real property was completed prior to the filing of the petition for an order for relief by the plaintiffs.”

Claim of automatic stay violation (debtors) Denied

“The recording of this affidavit after the filing of the Petition in Bankruptcy does not violate the automatic stay”

Sample v. Harlan
80-00376 / 80-0082 · 1980-11-04
Nondischargeability claim (Walter E. Sample) Denied

“the debt due Plaintiffs from the Debtors is dischargeable.”

Ageton v. Cervenka
80-0041 / 80-00044 · 1980-11-06
Motion to collect portion of homestead exemption (Edward and Sylvia Cervenka) Denied

“the Debtor should be allowed the homestead of $20,000.00, the amount allowed by the Arizona state statute on the date of filing the petition in bankruptcy.”

Coronado v. Beach Furniture & Appliance, Inc.
80-00615 · 1980-10-28
Motion to avoid lien on household furniture (debtors) Granted

“the Seller-Plaintiff does not have a valid purchase money security agreement in any of the furniture”

Motion to avoid lien on washing machine (debtors) Granted

“the Seller-Plaintiff does not have a valid purchase money security agreement in any of the furniture or the washer purchased”

Coronado v. Beach Furniture & Appliance
80-0147 / 80-00615 · 1981-02-05
Order to show cause for automatic stay contempt (Beach Furniture and Appliance Company, Inc.) Granted

“Beach Furniture and Appliance Company, Inc., and Norman Freeman, are in contempt of this Court.”

Order to show cause for automatic stay contempt (Norman R. Freeman) Granted
Request for contempt penalty (debtors) Moot / procedural

“At this time the Court is not going to assess a penalty”

Anderson v. Ruck
B-79-346 · 1980-05-05
Application for mortgagee attorneys fees (Donald W. Hopkins and Eldris Jo Hopkins) Granted in part

“the sum of $1,500.00 as and for attorney’s fees for the legal work of Mr. Kohn.”

Application for mortgagee expenses (Donald W. Hopkins and Eldris Jo Hopkins) Granted

“The expenses which Mr. Hopkins seeks, as follows: Title Report, $285.75; Court Costs, $47.79; Attorney’s Fees for Attorney for Trust, $450.00; U. S. Fiduciary, $772.08, are allowed.”

United States v. Jacobson
· 1983-10-18
Objection to discharge of criminal fine (United States) Granted

“the objection to the discharge of the fine of $2,500.00 imposed by the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, on the debtor, is sustained.”

Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Forcier
· 1980-10-08
Nondischargeability claim (Arizona Department of Economic Security) Granted

“the debt due plaintiff from defendant, Terry Joseph Forcier, of $1,745.00, is nondischargeable.”

Garcia v. Stamat Enterprises, Inc.
· 1981-02-10
Claim to avoid deed of trust (Josephine Garcia) Granted

“there was not disclosure made to the debtor and on this ground the Trust Deed should be avoided.”

Motion to admit interrogatory answers (Stamat Enterprises, Inc.) Denied

“the offer to introduce such written interrogatories and the answers thereto is denied.”

A historical record

Judge Scanland no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.