Randolph J. Haines

How Judge Haines rules, drawn from 20 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Haines no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona
Position
bankruptcy
Status
Retired 2014
Served
2000–2014
Commissioned
2000-03-01
Education
University of Wisconsin, B.A., philosophy; Yale University, Ph.D., philosophy; Stanford Law School, J.D.
Signed orders read
20

How Judge Haines decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

The court treated a revocable beneficiary designation as a state-law expectancy rather than a protected property interest of the debtor.

“Under governing Arizona law, the beneficiary's interest is similarly not protected and therefore a mere expectancy”

Procedural preferences

Claim similarity was treated as an evidence-sensitive question that could depend on guarantees and other nondebtor sources of recovery.

“similarity is a fact question that may appropriately hinge on creditors’ other remedies, interests, or relationships.”

Cautions

A stay request failed without evidence of likely irreparable injury, regardless of the creditor's arguments on legal merit.

“Comerica has not shown any likelihood of irreparable injury in the absence of a stay”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Glimcher
· 2011-09-26
Objection to exemption (the trustee and PNC Bank) Granted

“For these reasons, the claimed exemption of the John Hancock life insurance policy is denied and the objections to that claimed exemption are sustained.”

In re Meza
· 2012-02-09
Summary judgment (the Badillo defendants) Granted

“the Badillo Defendants' motion for summary judgment must be granted, and the Trustee's cross-motion for summary judgment denied.”

Cross motion for summary judgment (the trustee) Denied
In re Glimcher
· 2011-10-18
Objection to exemption (the trustee) Granted

“IT IS ORDERED the Debtor shall turn over to the Trustee all gift cards”

In re Glimcher
· 2012-05-08
Motion for turnover (the trustee) Granted

“the Trustee’s motion for turnover must be granted.”

In re Red Mountain Machinery Co.
· 2011-06-02
Motion for stay pending appeal (Comerica) Denied

“its motion for stay pending appeal is denied.”

Request for administrative stay (Comerica) Denied

“the ‘brief administrative stay’ must be denied as well.”

ML Liquidating Trust v. Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. (In re Mortgages Ltd.)
· 2011-06-24
Motions to remand (the defendant) Denied

“the motion to remand must be denied.”

In re Burgueno
· 2011-05-26
Motion to compel plan compliance (the debtor) Denied

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED denying the Debtor’s motion to compel the HOAs to comply with the confirmed plan.”

In re Loop 76, LLC
· 2010-11-22
Objection to plan classification (Wells Fargo) Denied

“Wells Fargo’s plan objection must be denied as a purely legal matter, but without prejudice to its renewal after the evidence is in.”

Flores v. Safadi (In re Safadi)
· 2010-04-28
Motion to vacate default judgment (the defendant) Denied

“The motion to vacate the default judgment must therefore be denied.”

In re Todd
· 2011-01-28
Motion to extend nondischargeability deadline (McManus) Granted

“Mc-Manus’ motion be granted and that Mc-Manus be given until 30 days after receipt of this ruling to file a nondischargeability complaint.”

Hoyt v. Aerus Holdings, L.L.C.
· 2011-03-10
Motions to remand (the plaintiffs) Granted in part

“IT IS ORDERED granting the motion to remand in part and denying the motion to remand in part.”

Motion to transfer venue (the defendants) Granted

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting the motion to transfer venue of the remaining portions of this adversary proceeding”

In re Red Mountain Machinery Co.
· 2011-04-14
Objection to plan confirmation (Comerica) Denied

“the objections of Comerica must be denied, and that the plan must be confirmed.”

Request to confirm chapter 11 plan (the debtor) Granted

A historical record

Judge Haines no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.