Kristi K. DuBose

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama district Appointed by George W. Bush (Republican) 25 signed orders read

How Judge DuBose decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

The judge consistently adopts an unopposed magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the court in routine dismissal motions, rather than independently re-writing the analysis.

“After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(B) and dated October 29, 2021 is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.”

On a multi-count motion to dismiss, the judge is willing to grant dismissal claim-by-claim rather than all-or-nothing, allowing a single viable count (here, a religious-accommodation claim) to survive alongside dismissal of the rest.

“the motion to dismiss is granted as to Counts II through XV and those Counts are dismissed. The motion is denied as to Count I”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Carson v. EEOC of Mobile
1:21-cv-00219-KD-MU · 2022-03-07
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED and the Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for insufficient process and insufficient service of process.”

Smitherman v. United States Department of Justice
2:20-cv-00377-KD-N · 2021-06-28
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. 19) is GRANTED and that Plaintiff Stephen Gillis Smitherman's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice.”

Williams v. Brennan
1:20-cv-00415-KD-MU · 2022-01-19
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Defendants' amended motion to dismiss (Doc. 24) is GRANTED and the Plaintiff's complaint is hereby DISMISSED.”

Hamil v. Acts Retirement-Life Communities, Inc.
1:22-cv-00366-KD-B · 2023-09-21
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“Defendants Acts Retirement-Life Communities, Inc., Presbyterian Retirement Corporation, Inc., and Westminster Village’s motion to dismiss is granted as to Counts II through XV and those Counts are dismissed. The motion is denied as to Count I, alleging religious discrimination under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. Section 2000e, et seq., for failure to accommodate.”

United States v. William R. Jewett, Jr.
1:09-cr-00076 · 2009-08-24
Motion for reconsideration (William R. Jewett, Jr.) Denied

“Accordingly, the motion to reconsider is DENIED.”

Durrell Williams v. Megan Brennan, et al.
1:20-cv-00415 · 2022-01-19
Motions to dismiss (Megan Brennan, et al.) Granted

“Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Defendants' amended motion to dismiss (Doc. 24) is GRANTED and the Plaintiff's complaint is hereby DISMISSED.”

United States v. Daniel Stuart Addison
1:08-cr-00204 · 2010-01-21
Motion to reinstate (Daniel Stuart Addison) Granted

“Upon consideration, and all time periods for further appeal having passed, the motion to reinstate is GRANTED and defendant's motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence by a person in federal custody (doc. 65) and memorandum in support (doc. 66) are hereby referred to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate disposition.”

Roosevelt Landrum v. Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP
1:16-cv-00399 · 2017-01-25
Motion to dismiss voluntary (Roosevelt Landrum) Granted

“Upon consideration, it is ORDERED that all of Plaintiff Roosevelt Landrum's remaining claims against Defendant Georgia Pacific Consumer Products LP are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice, with each party to bear his or its own attorneys' fees and costs.”

Toney Maurice Keith v. Emma Rudolph and Ray Farmer
1:13-cv-00071 · 2014-06-12
Summary judgment (Emma Rudolph and Ray Farmer) Granted

“Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Docs. 13, 19, 20) is GRANTED and that Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Emma Rudolph and Ray Farmer are DISMISSED without prejudice.”

Van P. Finger v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
1:10-cv-00192 · 2011-06-28
Motion to alter or amend judgment (State Farm Fire and Casualty Insurance Company) Denied

“For these reasons, it is ORDERED that State Farm's Motion to Alter, Amend or Vacate Judgment (Doc. 55) is DENIED.”

Kay C. Crews v. Standard Insurance Company
1:15-cv-00606 · 2016-06-22
Summary judgment (Standard Insurance Company) Granted

“In accordance with the Order entered this date granting Defendant Standard Insurance Company's motion for summary judgment, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Plaintiff Kay C. Crews' claims against Defendant are dismissed with prejudice.”

United States Government v. Clennon Preyear
1:05-cr-00267 · 2010-09-03
Motion to alter or amend judgment (Clennon Preyear) Denied

“Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Preyear's motion (Doc. 585) is DENIED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Sampled early caseload spans ADA, prisoner civil-rights, personal-injury, insurance, consumer-credit, and RICO cases. One sampled case produced an independently-authored (non-adopted) summary-judgment ruling in a premises-liability slip-and-fall suit.

Put Judge DuBose's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge DuBose actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge DuBose's own signed orders and cites them.