Arthur B. Briskman

How Judge Briskman rules, drawn from 13 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Briskman no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Position
bankruptcy
Status
Retired 2012
Served
1985–2012
Commissioned
1985
Education
University of Alabama, 1969; Cumberland School of Law at Samford University, 1972
Signed orders read
13

How Judge Briskman decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

A late formal proof of claim could amend an informal claim only if something capable of amendment had actually been filed before the bar date.

“before a court will allow a party to file a formal claim amending an informal claim, there must be something filed with the court capable of being amended.”

Cautions

Government action fell outside the police-power exception when it adjudicated private rights rather than serving public safety or public policy.

“If the governmental action is primarily related to public safety or to effectuate public policy, the action or proceeding is excepted from the automatic stay. However, governmental actions or proceedings to adjudicate private rights are 'not excepted from the automatic stay.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Haas
· 1996-03-06
Chapter 11 plan confirmation (debtors Thomas M. Haas and Bernice Elizabeth Haas) Granted

“The Debtors’ Third Amended Plan of Reorganization dated November 24, 1995 is hereby CONFIRMED, subject to the conditions contained in Paragraphs 49 and 50 herein with respect to the Debtors’ waiver of the statute of limitations contained in I.R.C. § 6502 and the modification to Article 6 of the Plan with respect to default.”

Objection to plan confirmation (Internal Revenue Service) Denied

“The objection of the Internal Revenue Service to confirmation of the Plan is without merit, and the objection is overruled.”

Objection to plan confirmation (Mobile County Tax Commissioner) Denied

“The objections to confirmation filed by the Mobile County Tax Commissioner and the Alabama Department of Revenue are overruled.”

Objection to plan confirmation (Alabama Department of Revenue) Denied
Motion to alter or amend order (Internal Revenue Service) Granted

“The August 18,1995 order is amended so as to reflect that the recorded notices of federal tax liens have a first priority lien position on the Debtors’ homeplace with respect to the Secor Bank mortgage lien.”

Motion for relief from stay (Internal Revenue Service) Denied

“The motions of the Internal Revenue Service for relief from stay and to dismiss this case are denied.”

Motion to dismiss chapter 11 case (Internal Revenue Service) Denied
Williams v. United States Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service (In re Williams)
· 1992-10-29
Complaint to determine tax dischargeability (debtor Sylvia Elizabeth Brock Williams) Granted in part

“ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the relief sought in the declaratory judgment complaint of the Debt- or, Sylvia Elizabeth Brock Williams, is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part;”

Complaint to avoid preference (debtor Sylvia Elizabeth Brock Williams) Granted

“ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the prepetition levy by the United States of America Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service of Sylvia Elizabeth Brock Williams’ wages is a preference proscribed by 11 U.S.C. § 547(b) and, to the extent of $1,400.00, is due to be AVOIDED;”

Turner v. Dees (In re Dees)
· 1992-08-17
Summary judgment (trustee Selwyn H. Turner Jr.) Granted

“ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Selwyn H. Turner, Jr.’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED;”

Summary judgment (debtor Ella Faye Dees) Denied

“ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Ella Faye Dees’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED;”

Townsend v. Townsend (In re Townsend)
· 1992-03-06
Debtor complaint to determine dischargeability (debtor Johnie Bryan Townsend) Denied

“The payments will provide Townsend the ability to meet immediate living expenses necessary to reestablish herself in the community and are nondis-chargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(5).”

Utility Contractors Financial Services, Inc. v. AmSouth Bank, N.A. (In re Joe Morgan, Inc.)
· 1991-03-28
Complaint to determine claim priority (Utility Contractors Financial Services, Inc.) Granted

“UCON’s complaint for distribution of proceeds from the collection of accounts receivable is due to be granted.”

Counterclaim to determine claim priority (Sunburst Bank) Denied

“Sunburst’s counterclaim for distribution of proceeds from the collection of accounts receivable collected by the Trustee and Am-South and declaration of priority of a perfected security interest held by Sunburst Bank is due to be denied.”

In re Watkins Management Group, Inc.
· 1990-10-19
Debtor objection to claim (debtor Watkins Management Group, Inc.) Denied

“The Debtor’s objection to CJV’s claim is therefore due to be overruled.”

In re Square Shooter, Inc.
· 1991-02-01
Motion for leave to file late claim (claimant Dave Goleman) Denied

“Based on the foregoing, this Court finds the Claimant’s Motion for allowance of the Proof of Claim filed May 10, 1990 is due to be denied,”

Debtor objection to claim (debtor Square Shooter, Inc.) Granted

“the Debtor’s Objection to allowance of the Claimant’s claim is due to be sustained.”

Kuck v. Alabama Department of Public Safety (In re Kuck)
· 1990-06-29
Summary judgment (debtors Robert A. Kuck and Michelle L. Kuck) Granted in part

“It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the motion of the debtors, Robert A. Kuck and Michelle L. Kuck, for summary judgment on their motion to hold the Alabama Department of Public Safety and Captain H.B. Miller in contempt for violation of the automatic stay is GRANTED in part;”

Summary judgment (Alabama Department of Public Safety and Captain H.B. Miller) Denied

“ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the motion of the defendant, the Alabama Department of Public Safety and Captain H.B. Miller, for Summary Judgment on the Plaintiff’s motion to hold the Alabama Department of Public Safety and Captain H.B. Miller in contempt for violation of the automatic stay is DENIED.”

In re Campbell
· 1991-04-19
Motion for relief from stay (Sears, Roebuck & Company) Granted

“Based on the foregoing, the Mov-ant’s motion for relief from the automatic stay is due to be granted,”

Secretary of Veterans Affairs v. Dickerson (In re Dickerson)
· 1991-04-19
Objection to plan confirmation (Secretary of Veterans Affairs and Federal National Mortgage Association) Denied

“the Claimants’ Joint Conditional Objection to the amended plan is due to be overruled;”

Chapter 13 plan confirmation (debtors Daniel Hurry Dickerson and Mary Alice Dickerson) Granted

“the Debtors’ amended plan is due to be confirmed;”

Complaint for declaratory and coercive relief (Secretary of Veterans Affairs and Federal National Mortgage Association) Denied

“the Claimants’ Joint Complaint for Declaratory Judgment and Coercive Relief are due to be denied.”

In re Leon's Casuals Co., Inc.
· 1990-11-30
Motion for payment of administrative expense (Selma Community Builders, Inc.) Granted

“the Movant’s motion for payment of an administrative expense of prepetition and post-petition rent and property taxes in the amount of $29,350.60 is due to be granted”

In re Janovski
· 1990-02-16
Motion for relief from stay (former spouse T.L. Paramanandhan) Denied

“the movant’s motion for relief from the automatic stay is due to be denied.”

A historical record

Judge Briskman no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.