Harold Dean Mooty III

How Judge Mooty rules, drawn from 12 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Position
district
Appointed by
Donald J. Trump (Republican)
Commissioned
2025-10-21
Education
University of Alabama, B.S., 2005; University of Alabama School of Law, J.D., 2008
Signed orders read
12

How Judge Mooty decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

He treated evidence touching each integrated-enterprise factor as enough to require a jury determination rather than summary judgment.

“there is some evidence of each of the four factors of the integrated enterprise or single employer test”

He allowed a credit-reporting claim to proceed where the pleaded facts supported a plausible inference that the report lacked a permissible purpose.

“Yarbrough has plausibly alleged a violation of § 1681b for failure to ensure a permissible purpose.”

Procedural preferences

Before imposing case-ending discovery sanctions, he required a concrete showing of prejudice rather than a generalized complaint about delay.

“no concrete examples of such prejudice”

He found dismissal with prejudice appropriate only after escalating measures—including extensions, a compel order, fees, and a warning—failed to secure compliance.

“Mr. Tolliver’s conduct is contumacious and that lesser sanctions would not suffice to ensure compliance.”

Cautions

A request to reopen did not cure earlier pleading defects where the movant failed to attach a proposed amended complaint.

“it does not attach a proposed amended complaint that might cure them.”

He treated a generic retaliation theory under the Equal Protection Clause as legally unavailable.

“A pure or generic retaliation claim, however, simply does not implicate the Equal Protection Clause.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Barrow v. Erica Lane Enterprises, Inc.
· 2026-06-15
Motions to dismiss (Erica Lane Enterprises, Inc.) Denied

“to dismiss, (doc. 31), is DENIED.”

Tolliver v. Runergy Alabama Inc.
· 2026-03-06
Motions to dismiss (Runergy Alabama Inc.) Granted

“Therefore, the court GRANTS Runergy’s motion to dismiss, (doc. 27), and”

State National Insurance Company, Inc. v. Treadwell
· 2026-01-23
Default judgment (State National Insurance Company, Inc.) Granted

“National’s motion for default judgment on its declaratory judgment claim is GRANTED.”

Dotson v. Ford Motor Company
· 2026-05-18

He dismissed the case without prejudice for failure to prosecute without reaching the pending summary-judgment motion. Quote: “this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Dotson’s failure to prosecute.”

United Benefits LLC v. Caputo
· 2026-04-27
Motion for reconsideration (Anthony Caputo and Gregory Guenther) Denied

“their request for reconsideration, (doc. 66), is DENIED.”

Campbell v. Skyward LLC
· 2026-04-24
Summary judgment (Skyward LLC and Aqua Systems Alabama LLC) Denied

“summary judgment, (doc. 37), is DENIED.”

Adams v. Pettway
· 2025-12-05
Summary judgment (Mark Pettway and Nashonda Howard) Granted

“summary judgment (Doc. 41) and DISMISSES the case.”

Nieves-Rios v. Broton
· 2026-05-18

He adopted an unopposed recommendation and dismissed the habeas action without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order. Quote: “action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b)”.

Turner v. State of Alabama Department of Corrections
· 2026-05-08
Motion to reopen (Dwain Evans Turner) Denied

“Turner’s Motion to Reopen, (doc. 14), is DENIED.”

Yarbrough v. Experian Information Solutions Inc.
· 2026-05-18
Motion for judgment on pleadings (Experian Information Solutions Inc.) Granted in part

“Pleadings, (doc. 14), is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.”

Warren v. Hegseth
· 2026-04-07
Motions to dismiss (Pete Hegseth) Granted in part

“For the reasons stated herein, Defendant Pete Hegseth’s Motion to Dismiss, (doc. 35), is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.”

Bridges v. Driscoll
5:25-cv-00961 · 2026-07-15
Motions to dismiss (Daniel Driscoll, Secretary of the Department of the Army) Granted

“For the reasons stated herein, Bridges’s claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median motion-to-ruling time: 11 days (N = 17).

The 20 returned post-commission cases included prisoner, habeas, Social Security, civil-rights, insurance, criminal, and other statutory matters. The case-level snapshot labeled all 20 pending, although several entry timelines already contained dismissal orders, so the status count should not be treated as current.

Draft for Judge Mooty with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Mooty, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Mooty's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace