Corey L. Maze
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“the court GRANTS School Health's motion to dismiss. (Doc. 11). The court's dismissal is WITHOUT PREJUDICE; meaning that the court will allow Aim 4 Pie one chance to replead its complaint to address the pleading deficiencies highlighted above.”
“the court will deny Wal Mart's motion for summary judgment as to Count 1 and dismiss as moot Wal Mart's motion as to Counts 2 and 3 (because the court grants Miles's motion to voluntarily dismiss those counts).”
“Norfolk Southern's Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 41) is GRANTED and Counts II, III, and IV are DISMISSED with prejudice.”
“the court will grant the respondent's motion for summary dismissal and deny Shirey's petition.”
“For these reasons, the court DENIES Finley's motion to remand. (Doc. 4).”
“the court GRANTS Russell's Motion to Remand, (doc. 9), and thus DENIES AS MOOT Landingham's Motion to Dismiss, (doc. 7).”
“King's motion to remand is due to be GRANTED.”
“Because Leonard failed to state claims upon which relief could be granted, the court will DISMISS this case with prejudice.”
“the court does not find that Leonard filed his claims against Wells Fargo in bad faith... So the court will deny Wells Fargo's motion for sanctions.”
“So the Court denies Vasser's motion for partial summary judgment.”
“the Court denies the motion without prejudice and invites Vasser to refile her motion at a later date, under the Court's forthcoming scheduling order.”
“The court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the claims raised in Adams' original § 2255 motion (doc. 1) and will enter a separate order directing the Clerk of Court to close this case.”
“the court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Frazier's claims related to (1) the search of his work truck, (2) the failure to obtain a voice analysis, (3) the failure to call character witnesses, (4) counsel's closing argument, and (5) the lack of evidence about the confidential informant's pending charges. The court SETS an evidentiary hearing on Frazier's claims that Anthony provided ineffective assistance by failing to obtain Frazier's work and cell phone records or protect Frazier's right to testify.”
“Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's report and ACCEPTS his recommendation. Accordingly, this action is due to be dismissed as duplicative.”
Caseload & timing
From public federal docket records for this judge.
Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 183 days (N = 15).
Median motion-to-ruling time: 120 days (N = 2).
Maze's reviewed docket includes employment and pay disputes, consumer-credit litigation, prisoner and habeas matters, insurance cases, civil-rights claims, sanctions questions, and contested dispositive motions in both counseled and self-represented cases.
Put Judge Maze's record to work
Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Maze actually rules, not a generic AI guess.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Maze's own signed orders and cites them.