Anna M. Manasco
How Judge Manasco rules, drawn from 16 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“the defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to Mr. Jones's claims against Carlos Wood; GRANTED as to Mr. Jones's Eighth Amendment claim against Jason Schmid for excessive force; and DENIED as to Mr. Jones's Eighth Amendment claim against Jason Schmid for deliberate indifference to Mr. Jones's serious medical needs.”
“the defendants' motion for summary judgment is due to be GRANTED, and the claims are due to be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”
“the court GRANTS the defendants' motion for summary judgment, DENIES the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, and DISMISSES this action WITH PREJUDICE.”
“DENIES the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction”
“the defendants' construed motion to dismiss, Doc. 29; Doc. 30, be GRANTED, and this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”
“the court GRANTS the motion for summary judgment filed by the AT&T Defendants and DENIES the motion for summary judgment filed by Mr. McCollum.”
“the partial motion to strike, Doc. 33, is DENIED, and the motion for summary judgment, Doc. 27, is GRANTED.”
“the City's motion for summary judgment, Doc. 27, is GRANTED.”
“Benton's motion to dismiss and compel arbitration, Doc. 9, is GRANTED.”
“Boyd does not direct this court to any controlling caselaw compelling dismissal of any of Mr. Devino Smithen's claims, nor does it establish that Mr. Smithen failed to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Therefore, the motion is DENIED.”
“the court GRANTS Tuscaloosa County's motion for summary judgment as to Count VII.”
“Accordingly, the court DENIES Tuscaloosa County's motion for summary judgment as to Count VIII.”
“Mr. Goodwin's lawsuit is untimely. Accordingly, Strickland's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close the case.”
“the City established ‘that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and [that] the [City] is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.’ ... Accordingly, the City's motion for summary judgment is due to be granted.”
“The court GRANTS summary judgment in favor of Cadence Bank and against Mr. Harris, on both Mr. Harris's claims and Cadence Bank's counterclaims.”
“Mr. Harris's Motion to Stay is DENIED.”
“Cadence Bank's Motion for Sanctions is DENIED as moot.”
Caseload & timing
From public federal docket records for this judge.
Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 353 days (N = 11).
The reviewed cases illustrate Judge Manasco's case mix but do not represent her full docket. Broader case-ending data are unavailable for the later part of the period.
Draft for Judge Manasco with the record in hand
Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Manasco, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Grounded in Judge Manasco's own signed orders
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace