Benjamin G. Cohen

How Judge Cohen rules, drawn from 22 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Cohen no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Position
bankruptcy
Status
Retired 2015
Served
1993–2015
Appointed by
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Commissioned
1993
Signed orders read
22

How Judge Cohen decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Stay relief favored the forum with the specialized expertise needed to complete a complex insurance dispute.

“the expertise of the District Court, including Judge Ott, is needed.”

A later veil-piercing judgment created a new obligation rather than reviving a debt that could have been scheduled earlier.

“The post-bankruptcy ‘piercing’ judgment created a new and distinct obligation which did not come into existence until after the debtor filed her previous case.”

Collective-bargaining rejection failed where the union's counterproposal supplied good cause for rejecting the debtor's proposal.

“the Court finds that the Union acted with good cause when it refused Bruno’s proposal”

Procedural preferences

The police-power exception was construed narrowly but still covered a public courthouse condemnation action.

“Congress intended this exception to be given a narrow construction.”

A general jury verdict did not establish the specific findings needed for issue preclusion in a nondischargeability action.

“this Court cannot know what the jury relied on”

A post-foreclosure mortgage claimant could amend only to pursue a properly grounded waste claim.

“he should file an amended proof of claim within fifteen (15) days of this order.”

Cautions

Interim turnover relief was unavailable without adequate protection for the counterparty's property interest.

“The Debtor has neither offered adequate protection to the Defendants nor proposed a method for providing adequate protection.”

A debtor could not force a postpetition creditor to file a claim or include the debt through unilateral schedule amendment.

“it is within the postpetition creditor’s control whether a proof of claim is filed for a postpetition debt.”

Reinstating a dismissed bankruptcy case did not retroactively recreate the automatic stay.

“vacating the order dismissing the case did not reimpose the automatic stay retroactively”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Health Science Products, Inc. v. AmSouth Bank, N.A. (In re Health Science Products, Inc.)
· 1994-10-11
Motion for injunctive relief and turnover (debtor) Denied

“the Court concludes that the Debtor’s motions are due to be denied.”

Motion for contempt (debtor) Denied
In re Haith
· 1995-06-23
Motion to amend schedules and modify plan (debtor) Denied

“the Debtor’s amendment and motion are due to be denied”

Stewart v. Hutchins (In re Hutchins)
· 1995-08-02
Summary judgment (debtor-defendant) Granted

“the defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is Granted;”

Anthony v. Anthony (In re Anthony)
· 1995-10-27
Motion to alter or amend judgment (debtor) Denied

“the Debtor’s Motion to Alter or Amend Judgement is due to be denied.”

In re Morris
· 1996-09-11
Objection to claim (debtor) Granted

“The debtor’s Objection to Claim No. 2 is SUSTAINED;”

Motion for relief from automatic stay (claimant) Denied

“The claimant’s oral Motion for Relief from the Stay is DENIED.”

Green v. University of Alabama (In re Green)
· 1997-06-23
Student loan dischargeability claim (debtor) Denied

“the student loan due the defendant is not dischargeable in this case and that the relief prayed for by the debtor should be denied.”

In re O'Neal
· 1997-08-20
Motion to vacate confirmation order (creditor Elizabeth O'Neal) Granted

“The confirmation order entered on February 24, 1 997 is vacated as to Elizabeth O’Neal;”

In re Bates
· 1999-07-13
Motions to dismiss (Jim Walter Homes) Denied

“any relief requested by the movant pursuant to section 109 is due to be denied.”

Objection to confirmation (Jim Walter Homes) Denied

“the objection to confirmation is due to be overruled.”

White v. United States Department of Education (In re White)
· 1999-12-01
Motion to alter amend or vacate (debtor) Denied

“The Court does not find that its final judgment was unjust or unfounded or would become so as the pending motion is denied.”

In re Peeples
· 2005-05-09
Motion to convert to chapter 7 (debtor) Granted

“The debtor’s Oral Motion to Convert to Chapter 7 is GRANTED;”

Motion to withdraw as attorney (debtor's attorney) Granted

“The Motion to Withdraw as Attorney filed by Donna Beaulieu is GRANTED;”

Worry Free Service, Inc. v. Harbison (In re Harbison)
· 2005-06-13
Summary judgment (creditor) Granted

“The Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the plaintiff is GRANTED;”

Moore v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In re Moore)
· 2005-11-02
Motion for temporary restraining order (debtors) Granted

“the defendant is due to be enjoined from foreclosing on the debtors’ home as scheduled for November 3, 2005.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The five sampled bankruptcy matters were terminated, but their empty electronic timelines do not support a motion or duration analysis.

A historical record

Judge Cohen no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.