Dwight H. Williams Jr.

How Judge Williams rules, drawn from 19 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Williams no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Position
bankruptcy
Status
Retired 2018
Served
1999–2018
Commissioned
1999-01-01
Signed orders read
19

How Judge Williams decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

A creditor with notice of bankruptcy had to take affirmative steps to stop a garnishment; leaving the process to continue was not enough.

“Nevertheless, the judgment creditor, with notice of the bankruptcy, must take affirmative action with respect to the garnishment and not simply allow it to run its course.”

Cautions

A claimant that waited until plan payments were complete before asserting priority status lost that position because the delay prevented a workable modification and prejudiced the debtors.

“DHR filed its general unsecured claim in this case in September 2006 and did nothing to assert its right to a priority claim until it filed the instant objection to the debtors’ motion for discharge almost four years later.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Atchison
· 2016-09-13
Creditor objection to plan confirmation (Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc.) Denied

“Accordingly, Vanderbilt’s objection to the confirmation of the debtor’s chapter 13 plan on the ground that its claim is non-modifiable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1322(b)(2) will be overruled.”

In re Anderson
· 2010-08-17
Objection to discharge (Alabama Department of Human Resources) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, the court finds that the debtors’ motion for discharge under Section 1328(a) should be granted, and DHR’s objection to the motion be overruled.”

Motion for chapter 13 discharge (the debtors) Granted
Myers v. Miracle Finance, Inc. (In re Myers)
· 2009-03-09
Motion for partial summary judgment (Claudelhia Myers) Granted

“Pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr.P. 9021, a separate order will enter granting plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment and setting an evidentiary hearing on the issue of damages.”

Cross motion for summary judgment (Miracle Finance, Inc.) Denied

“The defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment will be denied.”

In re Baxter
· 2007-08-20
Motion to modify chapter 13 plan (Chapter 13 trustee Curtis C. Reding) Granted

“Pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr.Proc. 9021, a separate order consistent with this opinion will enter overruling the objection filed by the debtors and granting the motion filed by the trustee to modify the plan.”

Objection to plan modification (the debtors) Denied
In re Thicklin
· 2006-10-25
Trustee objection to plan confirmation (Chapter 13 trustee) Granted

“For these reasons the court concludes that the trustee’s objection must be sustained.”

Shortsleeve v. Centurytel of Alabama, LLC (In re Shortsleeve)
· 2006-09-06
Motion to dismiss adversary complaint (Centurytel of Alabama, LLC and Robinson, Reagan & Young) Granted in part

“For these reasons, the defendants’ motion to dismiss the FDCPA counts of the complaint will be granted, but their motion to dismiss the counts seeking to enforce the discharge injunction and seek damages for its violation will be denied.”

In re Mims
· 2006-08-24
Trustee objection to plan confirmation (Chapter 13 trustee) Granted

“Therefore, confirmation of the instant plan is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED effective 20 days from the date of this order unless the debtor amends the plan consistent with this order.”

Motion to confirm chapter 13 plan (the debtors) Denied
In re Wright
· 2006-02-28
Creditor objection to plan confirmation (Centrix Funds Series CLPF) Denied

“Pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr.Proc. 9021, a separate order will enter overruling Centrix’s objection to confirmation of the plan.”

In re Horn
· 2006-02-23
Creditor objection to plan confirmation (City Finance Company) Denied

“City Finance’s objection to confirmation of Horn’s chapter 13 plan, to that extent, will be overruled by separate order.”

In re Tucker
· 2006-05-11
Motion to dismiss chapter 13 case (Internal Revenue Service) Granted

“Therefore, the IRS’s motion to dismiss will be granted, and a separate order will enter dismissing the debtor’s chapter 13 case for want of jurisdiction.”

In re Barron
· 2005-04-15
Motion for reconsideration (Green Tree-AL, L.L.C.) Granted in part

“ORDERED that the motion to reconsider filed by Green Tree-AL, L.L.C. is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.”

Harris v. Citigroup Inc. (In re Harris)
· 2003-04-17
Motions to remand (the debtor) Granted

“ORDERED that the debtor’s motion to remand is GRANTED, and this adversary proceeding is hereby REMANDED to the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Alabama.”

A historical record

Judge Williams no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.