Donald MacDonald IV

How Judge MacDonald rules, drawn from 22 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge MacDonald no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Alaska
Position
bankruptcy
Status
Retired 2012
Signed orders read
22

How Judge MacDonald decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A creditor seeking stay relief established standing by producing the original mortgage note and showing possession of a note specially endorsed in its favor.

“The bank has established its standing as a party in interest.”

In a commercial secured-credit dispute, MacDonald enforced an unambiguous cross-collateralization clause according to its text, including future unrelated obligations.

“The cross-collateralization clause in AFG’s 2002 commercial security agreement is unambiguous.”

He accepted a Chapter 13 modification that surrendered depreciating collateral when the debtors explained their changed finances and the record did not show manipulation or inequitable conduct.

“This simply is not a bad faith situation.”

Procedural preferences

A mortgage creditor seeking stay relief should establish standing by the preliminary hearing with competent evidence of the note and possession.

“this court will summarily deny, without prejudice, any future motion for relief from stay”

MacDonald independently reviewed professional-fee requests even when no party objected and required notice and a hearing before a material reduction.

“The bankruptcy court, however, has an independent duty to review fee applications of professionals in bankruptcy cases,”

Cautions

Plan proponents must support feasibility with reliable evidence; speculative leasing assumptions and flawed cash-flow projections will not carry the burden.

“Confirmation must be denied under such circumstances.”

A party opposing summary judgment on a false-oath theory must identify the specific statement at issue rather than rely on generalized allegations.

“He has a right to know what specific oath is in controversy so that he can prepare an appropriate defense.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Troy Buchan Thain and Di Ann Thain
05-01728 · 2006-12-07

The court proposed reducing an unopposed professional-fee request but retained the matter for notice and a hearing before entering a material reduction.

Rodvik v. Meddleton
07-90001 · 2007-04-17
Summary judgment (debtor) Granted

“The plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment will be granted.”

In re Kristen Joan Vesper
06-00565 · 2007-06-28
Motion to dismiss bankruptcy case (United States Trustee) Denied

“The UST’s motion to dismiss will, therefore, be denied.”

In re Security Aviation, Inc.
06-00559 · 2007-08-27
Objection to administrative priority (debtor) Granted

“Under controlling Ninth Circuit case law, I conclude that any costs or Rule 82 attorney’s fees that may be awarded to Air USA in the state court litigation are not entitled to administrative expense status.”

In re Mark J. Avery and Regional Professional Services, LLC
06-00455 · 2007-09-14
Motion for substantive consolidation (Chapter 7 trustee) Granted in part

“The trustee’s motion for substantive consolidation will be granted, in part, and denied, in part, as follows:”

Weidner v. Alaska Communications Systems Group, Inc.
07-90005 · 2008-02-01
Claim for automatic stay damages (debtor) Granted in part

“I find for the plaintiff in the sum of $250.00.”

In re Thomas Tuck Zaruba
07-00100 · 2008-03-11
Disclosure statement approval (debtors) Denied

“The debtors’ disclosure statements will not be approved and the plans will be denied confirmation.”

Chapter 11 plan confirmation (debtors) Denied
In re Daryl Warner Tinkess and Sally Ann Tinkess
08-00153 · 2008-09-26
Objection to exemption (judgment creditor) Denied

“ANIC’s objection to the debtors’ claims of exemption in the levied portion of their PFDs is overruled.”

Continental Insurance Company v. Catholic Bishop of Northern Alaska
08-90033 · 2009-09-11
Summary judgment (Catholic Bishop of Northern Alaska) Denied

“CBNA’s motion for summary judgment will be denied.”

Summary judgment (Continental Insurance Company) Granted

“CIC’s cross-motion will be granted.”

In re Alaskan Adventure Tours, Inc.
10-00282 · 2010-06-18
Motion to dismiss bankruptcy case (City and Borough of Yakutat) Granted

“The motion to dismiss will be granted, under the conditions requested by CBY.”

Motion for relief from stay (City and Borough of Yakutat) Granted

“the motion for relief from stay will be granted, to the extent relief from stay is necessary to satisfy the conditions specified for dismissal.”

Motion for adequate protection (City and Borough of Yakutat) Granted in part

“CBY’s request for adequate protection is granted to the extent already provided in this court’s Order Granting Debtor’s Motion for Authority to Conduct Business Outside the Ordinary Course”

In re Marcus Loyd King
10-00505 · 2010-10-25
Objection to proof of claim (debtor) Denied

“The debtor’s objection to Claim No. 3 will therefore be overruled.”

Alaska Electric and Control, Inc. v. Piening
09-90022 · 2010-11-08
Nondischargeability adversary claim (creditor) Granted

“Alaska Electric’s debt will be excepted from discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A).”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The fifteen terminated sampled matters lasted from 54 to 2,688 days, with a median of 113 days. The fixed sample is descriptive and is not a complete caseload census.

A historical record

Judge MacDonald no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.