PLR 9952058: Former QSUB may elect S status without five-year wait

Number
9952058
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Qualified Subchapter S Subsidiary
Code sections
§ 1361, § 1362, § 1368
Ruling dated
October 4, 1999
Publicly released
December 30, 1999

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 1999, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 1999
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An S corporation distributed the stock of its subsidiary to shareholders, ending the subsidiary's status as a qualified subchapter S subsidiary. The subsidiary sought to elect S corporation status before the five-year waiting period under § 1361(b)(3)(D) expired. The IRS waived that period and consented to the requested S election, effective on the date specified in the ruling. It also said the Form 2553 already filed was not invalid solely because its effective date was omitted. The subsidiary had to refile the form with the correct date within 60 days of the letter.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the former QSUB elect S status early, and does the omitted effective date invalidate its filed election?
  • Outcome: Approved. The waiting period was waived, and the company was instructed to refile Form 2553 within 60 days.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(b)(3)(D) and 1362(a); Treas. Reg. § 1.1362-6.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury

Index Number: 1361.05-00, Washington, DC 20224 1362.00-00

Number: 199952058
Person to Contact:
Release Date: 12/30/1999
Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:DOM:P&SI:2 - PLR-110295-99
Date:
October 4, 1999
X =

Y =

A =

D1 =

D2 =

D3 =

D4 =

D5 =

D6 =

Dear :

This letter responds to a letter dated June 1, 1999, and subsequent correspondence submitted by you as X’s authorized representative on behalf of X, concerning a waiver of the five- year waiting period imposed by § 1361(b)(3)(D) of the Internal Revenue Code in order to permit X to make an S corporation election under § 1362(a).

The information submitted states that X was incorporated D1, but it did not have any shareholders, assets, or business activities until D2. On D2, Y acquired all of the shares of X and distributed them to Y’s shareholders, applying the rules of § 1368 of the Code. A, the secretary and treasurer of X, represents that Y has been an S corporation since D6. On D4, Y filed a qualified subchapter S subsidiary (QSub) election under § 1361(b)(3)(B)(ii) for X, effective for D2. On D5, X filed a Form 2553, Election by a Small Business Corporation. A represents that the Form 2553 was intended to be effective D3, but no effective date was listed on the Form 2553.

-2-

Section 1362(a) provides that, except as provided in § 1362(g), a small business corporation may elect, in accordance with the provisions of § 1362, to be an S corporation.

Section 1362(b)(1) provides that, in general, an election under § 1362(a) may be made by a small business corporation for any taxable year (A) at any time during the preceding taxable year, or (B) at any time during the taxable year and on or before the 15th day of the 3d month of the taxable year.
Section 1.1362-6(a)(2)(i) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that a small business corporation makes an election under § 1362(a) to be an S corporation by filing a completed Form 2553. The election form must be filed with the service center designated in the instructions applicable to Form 2553. The election is not valid unless all shareholders of the corporation at the time of the election consent to the election in the manner provided in § 1.1362-6(b). However, once a valid election is made, new shareholders need not consent to that election.

In Thompson v. Commissioner, 66 T.C. 737 (1976), acq., 1977- 1 C.B. 1, the court held that an S corporation election filed timely for the corporation’s taxable year beginning December 1, 1969, but showing an erroneous effective date of January 1, 1969, was valid for the taxable year beginning December 1, 1969, which was the corporation’s second taxable year.

Section 1361(b)(3)(A) provides that except as provided in regulations prescribed by the Secretary, for purposes of the Code (i) a corporation which is a qualified subchapter S subsidiary (QSub) shall not be treated as a separate corporation, and (ii) all assets, liabilities, and items of income, deduction, and credit of a QSub shall be treated as assets, liabilities, and such items (as the case may be) of the S corporation.

Section 1361(b)(3)(B) defines a QSub as a domestic corporation that is not an ineligible corporation, as defined in § 1361(b)(2), if 100 percent of the stock of the corporation is owned by the S corporation, and the S corporation elects to treat the corporation as a QSub.

Section 1361(b)(3)(C) provides that for purposes of the Code, if any corporation which was a QSub ceases to meet the requirements of § 1361(b)(3)(B), the corporation shall be treated as a new corporation acquiring all of its assets (and assuming all of its liabilities) immediately before the cessation from the S corporation in exchange for its stock.

-3-

Section 1361(b)(3)(D) provides that if a corporation’s status as a QSub terminates, such corporation (and any successor corporation) shall not be eligible to make (i) an election under § 1361(b)(3)(B)(ii) to be treated as a QSub, or (ii) an election under § 1362(a) to be treated as an S corporation, before the 5 th taxable year which begins after the 1 st taxable year for which the termination was effective, unless the Secretary consents to the election.

In explaining § 1361(b)(3)(D), the Joint Committee on Taxation states as follows:

It is expected that the Secretary will provide waivers of the five-year rule in appropriate instances. For example, if the stock of the qualified subchapter S subsidiary is distributed to the individual shareholders of the subsidiary’s parent, the subsidiary will no longer be a qualified subchapter S subsidiary and would be subject to the five-year rule. If the parent corporation retains its subchapter S election and the Secretary determines that the distribution was not made for purposes of tax avoidance, it would seem appropriate for the Secretary to waive the five-year rule.

Joint Committee on Taxation Staff, General Explanation of Tax Legislation Enacted in the 104 th Congress (JCS-12-96), 104 th Cong., 2d Sess. 120 (1996).

Based solely on the facts and representations submitted, the Service waives the five-year waiting period imposed by § 1361(b)(3)(D) and consents to X’s S corporation election under § 1362(a), effective D3, and thereafter unless otherwise terminated.

We further conclude that X’s S corporation election, filed D5 to be effective D3, will not be considered invalid because of the lack of an effective date on the Form 2553. X should, within 60 days following the date of this letter, re-file the Form 2553 with the correct effective date included. A copy of this letter should be attached to the Form 2553.
Temporary or final regulations pertaining to one or more issues addressed in this ruling have not yet been adopted. Therefore, this ruling will be modified or revoked if the adopted temporary or final regulations are inconsistent with any conclusion in the ruling. See § 12.04 of Rev. Proc. 99-1, 1999-1 I.R.B. 6, 47. However, when the criteria in § 12.05 of Rev. Proc. 99-1 are satisfied, a ruling is not revoked or modified retroactively except in rare or unusual circumstances.

-4-

Except as specifically set forth above, we express no opinion concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of the Code.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being forwarded to X.
Sincerely yours,

H. GRACE KIM
Assistant to the Chief
Branch 2
Office of the Assistant
Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and
Special Industries)
Enclosures: 2
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace