PLR 9952053: S status preserved after trust held stock too long

Number
9952053
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Inadvertent Terminations
Code sections
§ 1361, § 1362
Ruling dated
October 1, 1999
Publicly released
December 30, 1999

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 1999, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 1999
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A shareholder's trust continued to hold S corporation stock more than two years after her death. Once that two-year period expired, the trust was no longer an eligible shareholder, and the company's S election terminated. Counsel discovered the problem later, and the trustee distributed the stock to eligible shareholders. The IRS found the termination inadvertent and ruled that the company would be treated as an S corporation from the termination date onward, provided its election was not otherwise terminated. The ruling is limited to that inadvertent termination issue.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Can the company retain S corporation treatment after an ineligible trust held its shares beyond the permitted two-year period?
  • Outcome: Approved; the termination was inadvertent, with continued S treatment subject to no other termination.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(c)(2)(A)(ii) and 1362(f).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury

Index Number: 1362.00-00 Washington, DC 20224 1362.04-00
Person to Contact:

Telephone Number:
Number: 199952053
Release Date: 12/30/1999 Refer Reply To:
CC:DOM:P&SI:1 PLR-112087-99
Date:
October 01, 1999

Legend

X =

H =

W =

Trust H =

Trust W =

State =

D1 =

D2 =

D3 =

D4 =

D5 =

D6 =

2
CC:DOM:P&SI:1 PLR-112087-99

This responds to the July 9, 1999 letter, submitted on behalf of X, requesting a ruling under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code that the termination of X’s subchapter S election was inadvertent.

FACTS

X was incorporated under State law. Effective D1, X elected to be treated as a subchapter S corporation.

As of D1, H and W (husband and wife) were the only shareholders of X. On D2, H and W each transferred shares of X stock to trusts – Trust H and Trust W, respectively. X represents that Trust H and Trust W were grantor trusts and permissible S corporation shareholders under § 1361(c)(2)(A)(i).

On D3, W died. Upon W’s death, Trust W became irrevocable and the entire corpus of the trust was includible in W’s gross estate for federal tax purposes. At the time of W’s death, Trust W held shares of X stock.

The administration of W’s estate and of Trust W were closely related. For reasons detailed in the ruling request, administration of W’s estate was delayed. Two years after W’s death, on D4, Trust W still held shares of X stock.

In D5, while reviewing H’s estate plan, counsel for H discovered that Trust W continued to hold X stock for more than two years after W’s death and that as a result, X’s S corporation election had terminated. Shortly after this discovery, on D6, X represents that the Trust W trustee distributed the shares of X stock held by Trust W to eligible S corporation shareholders.

Neither X nor its shareholders were aware that as of D4, Trust W no longer was an eligible S corporation shareholder. From D4 to D6, X and its shareholders treated Trust W as an eligible shareholder, and treated X as an S corporation. It was not part of a plan by X or any of its shareholders to terminate X’s S election.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 1361(a)(1) defines an “S corporation”, with respect to any taxable year, as a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a) is in effect for that year.

Section 1361(b)(1)(B) provided that a “small business corporation” cannot have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate and other than a trust described in § 1361(c)(2)) who is not an individual.

Section 1361(c)(2)(A)(i) provides that a trust, all of which is treated

3
CC:DOM:P&SI:1 PLR-112087-99

(under subpart E, part I, subchapter J, chapter 1) as owned by an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States, is a permitted shareholder of a small business corporation.

Section 1361(c)(2)(A)(ii) provided that, for purposes of § 1361(b)(1)(B), a trust that was described in § 1361(c)(2)(A)(i) immediately before the death of the deemed owner and that continues in existence after such death, is a permitted shareholder, but only for the 60-day period beginning on the day of the deemed owner’s death. Further, if the entire corpus of the trust is includible in the gross estate of the deemed owner, the preceding sentence shall be applied by substituting “2-year period” for “60-day period”. Section 1361(c)(2)(A)(ii).

Section 1362(d)(2)(A) provides that in general, an election under § 1362(a) shall be terminated whenever (at any time on or after the first day of the taxable year for which the corporation is an S corporation) the corporation ceases to be a small business corporation. The termination is effective on and after the day of the cessation. Section 1362(d)(2)(B)

Section 1362(f), in relevant part, provides that, if: (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any corporation was terminated under § 1362(d)(2); (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in such termination were inadvertent; (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in such termination, steps were taken so that the corporation is a small business corporation; and (4) the corporation, and each person who was a shareholder in the corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to this subsection, agrees to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in such termination, the corporation shall be treated as an S corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.

The committee reports accompanying the Subchapter S Revision Act of 1982, in discussing § 1362(f) as it relates to inadvertent terminations, state, in part, as follows:

If the Internal Revenue Service determines that a corporation’s subchapter S election is inadvertently terminated, the Service can waive the effect of the terminating event for any period if the corporation timely corrects the event and if the corporation and the shareholders agree to be treated as if the election had been in effect for such period.

The committee intends that the Internal Revenue Service be reasonable in granting waivers, so that corporations whose subchapter S eligibility requirements have been inadvertently violated do not suffer the tax consequences of a termination if no tax avoidance would result from the continued subchapter S treatment. In granting a waiver, it is hoped the

4
CC:DOM:P&SI:1 PLR-112087-99

taxpayers and the government will work out agreements that protect the revenues without undue hardship to taxpayers . . . . It is expected that the waiver may be made retroactive for all years, or retroactive for the period in which the corporation again became eligible for subchapter S treatment, depending on the facts.

S. Rep. No. 640, 97th Cong., 2d Sess. 12-13 (1982), 1982-2 C.B. 718, 723-24.

CONCLUSIONS

Based solely on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that X’s subchapter S election terminated on D4 when the two-year period described in § 1361(c)(2)(A)(ii) expired. We also conclude that the termination was an inadvertent termination within the meaning of § 1362(f). Under the provisions of § 1362(f), X will be treated as an S corporation from D4 and thereafter, provided that X’s S corporation election is not otherwise terminated under § 1362(d).

Except as specifically set forth above, no opinion is expressed concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of the Code.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to the power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to X.

Sincerely,

Signed/Dianna K. Miosi
Dianna K. Miosi
Chief, Branch 1
Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)
Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for §6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace