PLR 9950043: Pension funding waiver denied after temporary hardship was not shown

Number
9950043
Outcome
Denied
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Minimum Funding Waiver
Code sections
§ 412, § 4971, § 6110
Ruling dated
September 20, 1999
Publicly released
December 17, 1999

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 1999, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 1999
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A company requested a waiver of the minimum funding standard for its defined benefit pension plan. The company reported a net operating loss and had filed for Chapter 11 reorganization, while the plan's assets covered 81 percent of accrued benefits at the stated valuation date. The IRS denied the waiver because the submitted information did not show that the hardship was temporary. After the IRS offered a conference on its proposed denial, the company supplied no new information and did not arrange one. The letter says a funding deficiency would arise if the required contribution was not made and identifies the tax that would apply.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did the plan qualify for a waiver of the minimum funding standard?
  • Outcome: Denied because temporary hardship was not demonstrated.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 412, 4971(a); ERISA § 302.

Full text (IRS public release)

199950043

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury

Significant Index No. 0412.06-00 Washington, DC 20224

Contact Person:
Telephone Number:

In Reference to:
OP:E:EP:A:1

Date: SEP 20 1999
In re:

This letter constitutes notice that with respect to the above-named defined benefit pension plan, your request for a waiver of the minimum funding standard for the plan year ended December 31, 1998 has been denied.

The information furnished indicates that the company had a net operating loss for its fiscal year ended July 31, 1998. Also, on July 15, 1999, the company filed for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Regarding the plan, as of January 1, 1998, the plan's assets were equal to 81% of the plan's present value of accrued

benefits.

The information furnished failed to demonstrate that the hardship was temporary, and a denial of the request was proposed. The company was informed of our tentative denial and was offered a conference of right in our letter dated August 9, 1999. You were given 21 days to have a conference concerning our proposed denial. The 21-day period stated in our letter has passed. No new information has been furnished and you have not communicated with us to arrange a conference. Therefore, our tentative denial is now final.

Accordingly, the minimum funding standard under section 412 of the Code and section 302 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) will apply to the plan for the plan year ended October 31, 1997. Unless the company contributes to the plan an amount at least equal to the minimum funding requirement by September 15, 1999; there will be an accumulated funding deficiency, as of December 31, 1998, on which a 10% tax is imposed, under section 4971(a) of the Code.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k) (3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

-2-
199950043

We have sent a copy of this letter to the Key District Director in

Sincerely yours,

James E. Holland, Jr.
Chief, Actuarial Branch 1

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace