CCA 9949030: Merger raises recapture and filing issues for dual consolidated losses

Number
9949030
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Dual consolidated loss recapture
Code sections
§ 1503
Ruling dated
September 9, 1999
Publicly released
December 10, 1999

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 1999, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 1999
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel alerted an examination office to possible noncompliance with the dual consolidated loss rules after a corporate merger. A domestic subsidiary had losses in another country that its parent, the former common parent of a consolidated group, used on U.S. consolidated returns. The memorandum said the merger triggered recapture of those losses under the § 1503(d) regulations unless the former and new parent obtained a closing agreement. A closing agreement had been requested, but Chief Counsel was dissatisfied with required prior-year filings and said corrective filings were needed before it would consider the request. The office was not then considering a closing agreement or permission for corrective action; the memorandum did not grant or deny either request.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: What action should Examination consider after a merger triggered recapture of previously used dual consolidated losses?
  • Outcome: Advice given: the merger triggered recapture, and a closing agreement was not under consideration pending filing corrections.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 1503(d); Treas. Reg. § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(iii), (iv)(B), and (vi).

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
I N T E R N AL R E V E N U E S E R V I C E WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

September 9, 1999

Number: 199949030
Release Date: 12/10/199
CC:INTL:Br.4
WTA-N-114438-99

UILC: 1503.04-00
1503.04-07

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE NATIONAL OFFICE FIELD SERVICE ADVICE

MEMORANDUM FOR CHIEF, EXAMINATION BRANCH

FROM: Charles P. Besecky
Branch Chief CC:INTL:BR4

SUBJECT Treas. Reg. § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(iii): .

This Chief Counsel Advice is not binding on Examination or Appeals and is not a final case determination. This document is not to be cited as precedent.

LEGEND:

A =

B =

C =

Date 1 =

Date 2 =

Date 3 =

Date 4 =

Country 1 =

DISCUSSION:
2
WTA-N-114438-99

This is to alert you that B, does not appear to have complied with the regulations under section 1503(d) for its tax year ended Date 1.

As a result of the merger on Date 1, of a wholly-owned subsidiary of A, with and into B, B became a wholly-owned subsidiary of A. B had been the common parent of an affiliated group filing a consolidated federal income tax return.

B had a wholly-owned domestic subsidiary, C, that markets the products of B in Country 1. C incurred “dual consolidated losses” (“DCLs”) in Country 1 within the meaning of section 1503(d), that were utilized in the B consolidated tax returns filed for the tax years ending in Date 2.

When DCLs are utilized on a consolidated income tax return, the common parent of the consolidated return group is required to represent that it will recapture the DCLs upon the occurrence of certain events. The merger was an event requiring B to include in its taxable income the dual consolidated loss incurred by its subsidiary, C, for its taxable year in which the merger occurred. See Treas. Reg. § 1.1503- 2(g)(2)(iii).

The recapture can be avoided if B and A enter into a closing agreement with the Service pursuant to Treas. Reg. § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(iv)(B). A closing agreement was requested in a letter dated Date 3. On Date 4, the taxpayer’s representative was informed that we were not fully satisfied with the prior year filings by required to be filed with the tax return for each of the fifteen taxable years following the taxable year in which the dual consolidated loss was incurred pursuant to Treas. Reg. § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(vi) and that, before a request for a closing agreement would be considered by this office, appropriate filings would be required.

As of this date we are not aware of the taxpayer taking appropriate corrective actions with respect to the prior years filings, we are not presently considering any request for permission to take such corrective actions, nor are we presently considering entering into a closing agreement with B.

We are sending this to you so that your office may take appropriate action.

If you have any further questions, please call (202) 622-3860.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace