PLR 9948034: Software development costs may move to current deduction
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 1999, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A taxpayer had been amortizing certain software development costs over three to five years. It requested permission to deduct new costs currently when they were similar to research and experimental expenditures. The IRS granted the method change for qualifying costs paid or incurred from the first day of the 1998 year of change, subject to recordkeeping, consistent use, and return attachment conditions. Previously deferred costs had to remain on their existing amortization schedule. The district director could still determine on examination whether particular software costs qualified.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the taxpayer change from amortizing certain software development costs to deducting new qualifying costs currently?
- Outcome: Approved subject to four stated conditions.
- Key authorities: IRC § 174; Treas. Reg. § 1.174-2; Rev. Rul. 71-248.
Full text (IRS public release)
199948034
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Index No. 174.05-02
CC:DOM:IT&A:9 - PLR-111417-99
In re: SEP - 7 1999
X =
Y =
Dear
This is in reference to a request filed on behalf of X for permission to change to the current expense method of deducting costs similar to research and experimental expenditures relating to the development of computer software as provided for in Rev. Rul. 71-248, 1971-1 C.B. 55, for the tax year beginning January 1, 1998 (year of change).
It is represented that the taxpayer has been deferring costs similar to research and experimental expenditures which are being amortized over a period of 3 to 5 years. The change in accounting method will apply only to those computer software costs that are similar to research and experimental expenditures and that are paid or incurred by the taxpayer on or after the first day of the year of change. As of the first day of the year of change, the total amount of unamortized computer software costs similar to research and experimental expenditures was Y. This amount shall continue to be amortized over the remaining months in the amortization period.
Permission is hereby granted the taxpayer, pursuant to the facts presented, to change to the current expense method of deducting costs similar to research and experimental expenditures relating to the development of computer software, paid or incurred on or after the first day of the year of change to the extent that such expenditures are similar to expenditures that qualify under the provisions of section 1.174-2 of the regulations, beginning with the year of change, provided:
-2- 199948034
(1) that the taxpayer keeps its books and records for the year of change (provided they are not closed for that year on the date the taxpayer receives this letter) and for later tax years on the method granted in this letter;
(2) that the taxpayer uses the method granted in this letter for the year of change and for all later tax years unless the taxpayer secures permission to change to another recognized method;
(3) that the taxpayer deducts the unamortized balance of costs similar to research and experimental expenditures treated as deferred expenses prior to the first day of the year of change, in accordance with its present method of amortizing such expenditures; and
(4) that the taxpayer attaches a copy of this letter to its tax return for the year of change as evidence of its authority for making the change.
In connection with the permission granted herein, it should be understood that the responsibility for making determinations as to whether the expenditures for the development of computer software paid or incurred by the taxpayer in connection with the taxpayer's trade or business are costs similar to research and experimental expenditures is a matter to be considered by the district director upon examination of the taxpayer's return.
The letter ruling is sent under the provisions of the power of attorney on file with this office. A copy of the letter ruling is being sent to the taxpayer.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(j)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Sincerely yours,
Assistant Chief Counsel
(Income Tax & Accounting)
By
J. Charles Strickland
Chief, Branch 9
Identification Number 50-07044
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace