PLR 9947035: Foundation may claim a further qualifying distribution when building rights transfer

Number
9947035
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Qualifying Distribution
Code sections
§ 170, § 4942, § 501, § 509
Ruling dated
August 27, 1999
Publicly released
November 26, 1999

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 1999, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 1999
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A private foundation built a building on leased land for its own use and for a charity's benefit. It had already claimed the construction costs as qualifying distributions. After the building loan was paid, the foundation planned to end the leases and transfer its rights in the land and building to another organization, while retaining rights to use one floor. The IRS ruled that, in the year of the transfer, the foundation could claim a further qualifying distribution equal to the building's fair market value, reduced by its earlier qualifying distributions and the fair market value of the rights it retained. The ruling depends on no material change in the stated facts.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the foundation claim another qualifying distribution when its building rights transferred after it had claimed the construction costs?
  • Outcome: Approved: the additional amount is reduced by prior qualifying distributions and the value of retained rights.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 4942(g); Treas. Reg. § 53.4942(a)-3(a)(1); Rev. Rul. 79-375.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
199947035
Contact Person:
Telephone Number:
In Reference to: OP:E:EO:T:4
Date: AUG 27 1999

Legend:
B=
C=
D=
E=

Dear Sir or Madam:

This is in response to your letter dated April 26, 1999, in which you requested a ruling under section 4942 of the Internal Revenue Code.

You are exempt under section 501(c) (3) of the Code and have been classified as a private foundation within the meaning of section 509(a).

In 1983, you made arrangements to construct a building to be known as B for your use and for the benefit of C, an organization

described in Code sections 501(c) (3) and 170(b) (1) (A) (ii), and an arm of D. You leased property from D located on the campus of C and built B on that property. In order to construct B, you

borrowed funds from E. The loan was secured by a first deed of trust on B. D cannot accept a gift of property which is subject to a mortgage or deed of trust, so you leased the majority of B to D for a nominal amount and retained certain property rights in and to B.

You took as qualifying distributions in 1983 through 1986 the cost of constructing B. The last payment on the loan has been made. Upon termination of (a) the land lease from D to you and (b) the lease from you to D, B will become the sole and absolute property of D in fee simple. All your rights in and to the land and B will transfer to D, except those specified in a reservation of rights agreement with respect to your use of one floor of B. You propose to take as a qualifying distribution an amount equal to the current fair market of B less the amount of

2 199947035

previous qualifying distributions relating to B, less the fair market value of your retained rights in B.

You have represented that B has been, and continues to be, used directly to carry out a charitable or other public purpose.

Section 4942(a) of the Code imposes tax on the undistributed income that a private foundation fails to timely distribute. Section 4942(c) provides that “undistributed income” is the distributable amount required to be distributed less qualifying distributions as defined under section 4942 (g).

Section 4942(g) (1) of the Code provides that the term “qualifying distribution" means any amount paid to accomplish one or more purposes described in section 170(c) (2) (B), or any amount paid to acquire an asset used or held for use directly in carrying out one or more purposes described in section 170 (c) (2) (B).

Section 53.4942(a)-3(a) (1) of the Foundation and Similar Excise Taxes Regulations provides that the amount of a qualifying distribution of property is the fair market value of the property on the date the qualifying distribution is made.

Rev. Rul. 79-375, 1979-2 C.B. 389, holds that if a private foundation that has made a qualifying distribution equal to the purchase price of an asset donates the asset to a publicly supported charity, it will be allowed a second qualifying distribution to the extent that the fair market value of the asset on the date of contribution exceeds the amount of the first qualifying distribution under section 4942(g) (1) of the Code.

Based upon the information submitted, we have determined that you may claim as a qualifying distribution, in the year in which transfer of your rights in the land to D occurs, an amount equal to the fair market value of B less the amount of previous qualifying distributions claimed by you as to B less the fair market value of your reserved rights in B.

This ruling is conditioned on the understanding that there will be no material changes in the facts upon which it is based.

We are informing the EP/EO key district office of this action. Please keep a copy of this ruling with your permanent records.

3 199947035

This ruling is directed only to the organization that requested it. Section 6110(k) (3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Sincerely yours,

Gerald V. Sack
Chief, Exempt Organizations
Technical Branch 4

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace