PLR 9946029: Relief restores S corporation treatment after ineligible owner joins

Number
9946029
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Definitions; Inadvertent Terminations
Code sections
§ 368, § 7701, § 1361, § 1362, § 1366, § 1367, § 1368
Ruling dated
August 5, 1999
Publicly released
November 19, 1999

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 1999, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 1999
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An S corporation converted to a state law limited partnership and elected to remain classified as a corporation for federal tax purposes. Another corporation contributed cash for an interest, making it an ineligible S corporation shareholder and ending the S election. Once the company discovered the problem, its two original owners acquired that corporation’s interest. The IRS found the termination inadvertent and allowed S corporation treatment for the affected period and afterward, provided the election does not otherwise terminate and all parties report consistently with that treatment. It did not decide whether the conversion qualified as a reorganization under § 368(a)(1)(F).

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Can the company receive inadvertent termination relief after a corporate owner briefly held an interest?
  • Outcome: Approved: S corporation treatment continues for the affected period, subject to consistent reporting and the election's other requirements.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361, 1362(f), 1366–1368, and 368(a)(1)(F); Treas. Reg. § 301.7701-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

199946029

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Index Number: 7701.00-00; 1362.04-00
Washington, DC 20224

Person to Contact:
Telephone Number:
Refer Reply To:
CC:DOM:P&SI:03-PLR-107408-99
Date: August 5, 1999

Legend
Company =
Corporation =
State =
A =
B =
d1 =
d2 =
d3 =
d4 =
d5 =

PLR-107408-99 2 199946029

Dear

This letter responds to a letter dated d5, on behalf of Company, requesting relief under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code.

FACTS

According to the information submitted, Company was incorporated under the laws of State on d1 and elected to be treated as an S corporation as defined in
§ 1361(a) effective on d1.

On d2, Company converted to a limited partnership under the laws of State with the shareholders (A and B) retaining their proportionate interests. Pursuant to the conversion, Corporation also contributed cash to Company in exchange for an interest. For purposes of local law, Corporation was considered the sole general partner while A and B were considered limited partners, however, all interests provided identical rights to operating and liquidating distributions. On or about d3, Company filed a Form 8832 (Entity Classification Election) electing to be classified as an association taxable as a corporation for all federal tax purposes effective for the start of its existence as a State law limited partnership. Company represents that the conversion was a reorganization within the meaning of § 368(a)(1)(F).

In conjunction with the preparation of the Form 8832, Company became aware that Corporation was an ineligible shareholder. On d4, A and B (acting through their respective disregarded limited liability companies), acquired Corporation’s interest in Company.

Company did not know that admitting Corporation as a general partner would terminate its S election. Company's admission of Corporation was not motivated by federal income tax avoidance or retroactive federal income tax planning. Company and each of its shareholders who were shareholders during the termination period agree to make any adjustments consistent with the treatment of Company as an S corporation.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Company converted from a corporation to a limited partnership under the laws of State and elected under § 301.7701-3 to be classified as an association taxable as a corporation for federal tax purposes. Company has represented that the conversion qualified as a reorganization under § 368(a)(1)(F). If the conversion qualified as a reorganization under § 368(a)(1)(F), then the conversion would not have terminated

3 199946029

PLR-107408-99

Company's S corporation election provided Company still met the requirements of an S corporation under § 1361. See Rev. Rul. 64-250, 1964-2 C.B. 333.

Section 1361(a)(1) defines an "S corporation" as a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a) is in effect for the taxable year.

Section 1361(b)(1)(B) provides that a "small business corporation" means a domestic corporation that is not an ineligible corporation and that does not have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate, a trust described in § 1361(c)(2), or an organization described in § 1361(c)(6)) who is not an individual.

Section 1362(d)(2) specifies that a corporation’s election under § 1362(a) will terminate whenever (at any time on or after the first day of the first taxable year for which the corporation is an S corporation) such corporation ceases to be a small business corporation.

Section 1362(f) provides in part that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any corporation was terminated under § 1362(d)(2) or (3); (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in such termination were inadvertent; (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in the termination, steps were taken so that the corporation is a small business corporation; and (4) the corporation, and each person who was a shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees to make the adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary for that period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in such termination, the corporation shall be treated as an S corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.

CONCLUSION

After applying the relevant law to the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that Company's election to be an S corporation terminated as of d2 when Corporation acquired an interest in Company. We also hold that the termination was inadvertent within the meaning of § 1362(f).

We further hold that under the provisions of § 1362(f), Company will be treated as an S corporation during the period of d2 through d4, and thereafter, provided Company's S corporation election does not otherwise terminate under § 1362(d). Accordingly, in determining their federal tax liability for the period from d2 to d4, the shareholders (A and B) and Corporation must include their pro rata share of the separately and nonseparately computed items of Company under § 1366, make adjustments to stock basis under § 1367, and take into account any distributions made

4 199946029

PLR-107408-99

by Company under § 1368. If Company, A, B, or Corporation fail to treat Company as described above, this ruling shall be null and void.

Except as specifically set forth above, we express no opinion concerning the federal tax consequences of the transactions described above under any other provision in the Code. In particular, no opinion is expressed on whether the conversion qualified as a reorganization under § 368(a)(1)(F).

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Sincerely yours,

(signed) William P. O'Shea

William P. O’Shea

Chief,

Branch 3

Office of the Assistant
Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special
Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace