PLR 9944031: Revised spin-off facts leave prior rulings in force

Number
9944031
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Distribution of Stock and Securities of a Controlled Corporation
Code sections
§ 355
Ruling dated
August 9, 1999
Publicly released
November 5, 1999

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 1999, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 1999
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A corporation had previously received a ruling for a proposed transfer of assets to a controlled corporation followed by a distribution of that corporation's stock to shareholders. Before completing the transaction, it reported revised ownership, share counts, and terms under which a key employee would buy stock. It also reported asset sales by two subsidiaries and supplied updated information on their business activity. The IRS ruled that these changes did not affect the earlier rulings, which remained in force. The letter did not address tax consequences beyond the earlier rulings.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Do revised facts about a planned spin-off and employee stock purchase change the earlier rulings?
  • Outcome: Approved; the earlier rulings remain in force on the represented facts.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 355 (the letter's index classification).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury Index Number: 355.00-00 Washington, DC 20224

Number: 199944031
Person to Contact:
Release Date: 11/5/1999 Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:DOM:CORP:1-PLR-106319-99
Date:
August 9, 1999

Distributing
=

Controlled
=

Subsidiary 2
=

Subsidiary 3
=

Shareholder A
=

Shareholder B
=

a
=

b
=

c
=

q
=

p
=

X
=

Y
=

PLR-106319-99
2

Key Employee
=

Date 1
=

Dear
:

This is in response to your request dated March 17, 1999, for a supplemental ruling to PLR 9830016 (“Prior Letter Ruling”) issued by our office on April 24, 1998. Specifically, you requested that certain factual changes to the Prior Letter Ruling have no effect on the rulings granted in the Prior Letter Ruling. Additional information regarding this request has been received in a letter dated May 4, 1999.

In the Prior Letter Ruling, Distributing proposed to transfer certain assets to Controlled and then to spin-off Controlled pro rata to its shareholders. The business purpose for the transaction was to enable Key Employee to acquire a significant interest in Controlled through the purchase of shares of Controlled Class B common stock which will be authorized following the spin-off. The transaction has not yet been consummated. Distributing now proposes to effect the transaction described in the Prior Letter Ruling, subject to the changes described below

The following factual changes are hereby made to the Prior Letter Ruling:

(1) Key Employee will acquire, on a diluted basis, Controlled Class B common stock reflecting q% of the voting power of Controlled.

(2) 54.03% of the outstanding Distributing common stock is owned by Shareholder A. An additional 39.35% of the stock is owned by Shareholder B.

(3) At the time of the distribution, Distributing will have a shares of stock outstanding and Controlled will have b shares of stock outstanding so that in the pro rata distribution of Controlled each holder of a Distributing share will receive approximately c shares of Controlled Class A stock for each share of Distributing stock held.

(4) As soon as is practicable, and within one year, Key Employee will purchase X shares of Class B common stock from Controlled, representing p% of the total value of the shares, and q% of the total vote. Key Employee will pay Y, a price based upon a formula believed by the company to represent the value of the shares. Key Employee will issue a note to Distributing in the amount of Y. This note will have a ten-year term and provide for equal monthly payments of principal with interest at 30 days LIBOR. Additionally, Controlled and Key Employee have agreed to arrange an option, with terms satisfactory to both parties, to enable Key Employee to acquire additional Class A stock representing

PLR-106319-99
3

p% of the value of Controlled, to be exercisable within one year of the initial purchase of the Class B stock.

On Date 1, Subsidiary 2, a subsidiary of Distributing, sold part of its assets but retained 35% of its historical assets. On that same date, Subsidiary 3, also a subsidiary of Distributing, sold part of its assets but retained 90% of its historical assets. The taxpayer has provided updated financial information which indicates that the businesses conducted by Subsidiary 2 and Subsidiary 3, following the sale of assets, have had gross receipts and operating expenses representative of the active conduct of a trade or business for each of the past five years.

Based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, we rule that the changes discussed above have no effect on the rulings provided in the Prior Letter Ruling and the rulings remain in full force and effect.

No opinion is expressed about the tax treatment of the proposed transaction under other provisions of the Code and regulations or about the tax treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, the proposed transaction that are not specifically covered by the above rulings.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6610(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

This letter supplements the Prior Letter Ruling. A copy of this letter and the Prior Letter Ruling should be attached to the Federal income tax returns of the taxpayers involved for the taxable year in which the transaction covered by this ruling is consummated.

Sincerely yours,

Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate)

By_____
Christopher W. Schoen
Assistant to the Chief, CC:DOM:CORP:1

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace