PLR 9944017: Funds allowed to revoke excise tax timing elections
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 1999, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Twelve regulated investment companies had elected to use their calendar tax years when calculating capital gains for the § 4982 required distribution. They asked to revoke those elections because the timing created administrative burdens. The IRS consented to revocation after accepting their representations that they sought no tax advantage and would not prejudice the government. For the transition year, the funds would calculate relevant capital gains and foreign currency gains or losses over January through October. They could not make the same election again for five calendar years following the year of revocation.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the funds revoke their § 4982(e)(4)(A) elections and use a ten-month transition period?
- Outcome: Approved, with a five-year restriction on making a new election.
- Key authorities: IRC § 4982(b)(1), (e)(4), (e)(5).
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Index Number: 4982.00-00 1111 Constitution Ave, NW Washington, DC 20224
Person to Contact:
Number: 199944017 Telephone Number: Release Date: 11/5/1999 Refer Reply To:
CC:DOM:FI&P:2 / PLR-111479-99
Date:
August 3, 1999
LEGEND:
Fund 1:
Fund 2:
Fund 3:
Fund 4:
Fund 5:
Fund 6:
Fund 7:
Fund 8:
Fund 9:
Fund 10:
Fund 11:
PLR-111479-99
2
Fund 12:
Year A:
Year B:
Year C:
Year D:
State:
Dear :
This is in reply to a letter dated June 8, 1999, seeking consent to revoke for Year A and subsequent calendar years thereafter, an election previously made by Fund 1, Fund 2, Fund 3, Fund 4, Fund 5, Fund 6, Fund 7, Fund 8, Fund 9, Fund 10, Fund 11 and Fund 12 (collectively "Fund or Funds") under section 4982(e)(4)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended ("the Code"). Additionally, the Funds request that the calculation of their required distributions of capital gain net income under section 4982(e)(2) and foreign currency gains and losses under section 4982(e)(5) for the calendar year ending December 31, Year A be determined on the basis of the capital gains and losses and foreign currency gains and losses realized and recognized during the ten month period from January 1, Year A through October 31, Year A.
Each Fund is organized as a State corporation and, except as noted below, is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as a diversified, open-ended management company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq. Fund 10 is a non-diversified, open-ended management company registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each Fund has elected and qualified, and intends to continue to qualify, to be treated as a regulated investment company ("RIC")under Subchapter M of the Code.
Funds use the accrual method of accounting for tax and financial accounting purposes and use the calendar year for tax purposes. Beginning with Year B, Funds that existed at the time elected under section 4982(e)(4)(A) of the Code to use their taxable years (the calendar year) in lieu of the one-year period ending on October 31, for the purposes of calculating the required distribution amount under section 4982(b)(1)(B) and 4982(e)(2). New Funds beginning operations subsequent to Year B made the election in their first year. Funds taxable years have also been used in determining the treatment of foreign currency gains and losses under section 4982(e)(5). Funds assumed that the election under section 4982 would relieve the administrative
PLR-111479-99
3
burden associated with dual calculations of capital gain net income and section 988 gain or loss under the excise tax and subchapter M provisions of the Code.
The experience of Funds has been that the election has created additional administrative complexities primarily due to the time constraints in declaring required excise tax distributions. Further, the promulgation of regulations coordinating the excise tax and subchapter M provisions has greatly reduced the administrative burden of having a tax year different from the period used for determining the required distribution under section 4982. Accordingly, Funds seek consent to revoke their elections to use their taxable years (the calendar year) for purposes of sections 4982(b)(1)(B), 4982(e)(2), and 4982(e)(5).
Each Fund represents that:
1. The desire to revoke its election is due to administrative and non-tax related financial burdens caused by the election;
2. It is not seeking to revoke its election for the purpose of preserving or securing a tax benefit;
3. It will neither benefit through hindsight nor prejudice the interests of the government as a result of being permitted to revoke its election;
4. It will not make a subsequent election under section 4982(e)(4)(A) of the Code for five calendar years following the year of the grant of revocation.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 4982(a) of the Code, which was enacted as part of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 and is effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 1986, imposes an excise tax on every RIC for each calendar year equal to 4 percent of the excess (if any) of the "required distribution" for the calendar year over the "distributed amount" for the calendar year.
Section 4982(b)(1) defines "required distribution" to mean, with respect to any calendar year, the sum of 98 percent of the RIC’s ordinary income for such calendar year plus 98 percent of its capital gain income for the 1-year period ending on October 31 of such calendar year.
Section 4982(e)(4)(A) provides that if the tax year of the RIC ends with the month of November or December, the RIC may elect to have the capital gain net income for its tax year applied in lieu of the 1-year period ending on October 31 of the
PLR-111479-99
4
calendar year for the purposes of satisfying the required distribution defined in section 4982(b)(1). Section 4982(e)(4)(B) provides that, once made, such an election may be revoked only with the consent of the Secretary.
Section 4982(e)(5) provides that any foreign currency gain or loss which is attributable to a section 988 transaction and which is properly taken into account for the portion of the calendar year after October 31 shall not be taken into account in determining the amount of ordinary income of the RIC for such calendar year but shall be taken into account in determining the ordinary income of the investment company for the following calendar year. In the case of any company making an election under section 4982(e)(4), however, the preceding sentence shall be applied by substituting the last day of the company’s taxable year for October 31.
CONCLUSION
Based on the information submitted and the representations made, we conclude that Funds’ desire to revoke their elections under section 4982(e)(4)(A) is because of administrative burdens and not because of any federal tax-related financial burden caused by the election. Funds do not seek to revoke their elections for the purpose of preserving or securing a federal tax benefit. Additionally, Funds will neither benefit through hindsight nor prejudice the interests of the government as a result of being permitted to revoke their election.
Accordingly, it is held as follows:
1. Pursuant to section 4982(e)(4)(B), the Secretary consents to the revocation of the elections made by Funds under section 4982(e)(4)(A) effective for calendar Year A and subsequent years.
2. For purposes of section 4982(b)(1), the capital gain net income of Funds as defined in section 4982(e)(2) and any foreign currency gains and losses as defined in section 4982(e)(5) for the calendar year ending December 31, Year A will be determined on the basis of the capital gains and losses and foreign currency gains and losses taken into account during the 10 month period from January 1, Year A through October 31, Year A.
As a condition to the Secretary’s consent to the revocation pursuant to section 4982(e)(4)(B), Funds may not make a subsequent election under section 4982(e)(4)(A) for a period of 5 calendar years following the year to which the grant of revocation applied, that is, Year C through Year D.
PLR-111479-99
5
Except as specifically ruled upon above, no opinion is expressed or implied as to the federal excise or income tax consequences regarding Funds.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayers that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
It is important that a copy of this letter be attached to the federal income and excise tax returns filed by Funds for the first year to which this ruling applies.
In accordance with the power of attorney on file, a copy of this letter is being sent to Taxpayer’s authorized representatives.
Sincerely,
Assistant Chief Counsel
(Financial Institutions & Products)
By: William E. Coppersmith
William E. Coppersmith
Chief, Branch 2
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace