CCA 9943004: Advice on enforcing an IRS summons
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 1999, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A district counsel asked whether the Department of Justice should petition to enforce an administrative summons served on a taxpayer. The publicly released memorandum states the question, but the conclusion, facts, and case development are redacted. Its answer and reasoning cannot be determined from the released text.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Should the Justice Department be asked to enforce the IRS summons?
- Outcome: Advice given; the conclusion is redacted.
- Key authorities: None identified in the released text.
Full text (IRS public release)
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
I N T E R N AL R E V E N U E S E R V I C E WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
July 16, 1999
Number: 199943004
CC:EL:GL:Br3
Release Date: 10/29/1999
GL-704489-99
UILC: 75.04.06-00
9999.98-00
MEMORANDUM FOR REID M. HUEY
DISTRICT COUNSEL,
FROM: Lawrence H. Schattner
Chief, Branch 3 (General Litigation)
SUBJECT:
This responds to your memorandum dated July 1, 1999. This document is not to
be cited as precedent.
Issue
Whether the Department of Justice should be requested to file a petition to enforce
the administrative summons served on the taxpayer?
Conclusion
Facts
2
.
Case Development
3
.
If you have any questions, please call (202) 622-3630.
Attachments:
As stated
cc: Assistant Regional Counsel (GL), Midstates Region
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace