PLR 9939047: Sale of coal car repair business permits plan distributions to transferred workers

Number
9939047
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Cash or Deferred Arrangements
Code sections
§ 401, § 402, § 409, § 414, § 6110
Ruling dated
July 7, 1999
Publicly released
October 1, 1999

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 1999, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 1999
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A railroad car company sold seven of its nine coal car repair facilities to an unrelated buyer. Those facilities represented 99 percent of the assets of its coal car repair business. The company wanted to make lump sum distributions from its 401(k) plan to employees who moved to the buyer. The IRS treated the coal car repair operation as a separate trade or business and ruled that the sale disposed of substantially all of its assets under § 401(k)(10)(A)(ii). It also ruled that the proposed distributions would satisfy the plan distribution restrictions because the seller would keep the plan, the buyer would not maintain it, and the affected employees would continue working for the buyer. The ruling assumed the plan remained qualified under § 401(a).

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the seller distribute 401(k) balances to employees who joined the buyer after the asset sale?
  • Outcome: Approved; the sale met the substantially all assets rule and the described distributions were permitted.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 401(k)(2)(B)(i), 401(k)(10)(A)(ii), and 402(d)(4); Treas. Reg. § 1.401(k)-1(d)(4) and (5).

Full text (IRS public release)

Significant Index No.: 401.29-00 199939047

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Person to Contact:
Telephone Number:
Refer Reply to: OP:E:EP:T:3

Date:

JUL 7 1999
LEGEND:

Company A:
Business B:
Buyer C:

Plan X:

Dear

This letter is in response to a request for a ruling letter submitted on your behalf by your authorized representatives on May 25, 1999, concerning the tax consequences of certain distributions described in section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code ("Code").

Your authorized representatives have submitted the following facts and representations in support of the requested rulings:

Company A maintains Plan X, which is a profit sharing plan that contains a cash or deferred arrangement as described in Code section 401(k). Plan X is qualified under Code section 401(a).

Company A is engaged principally in the business of manufacturing railroad cars. It also repairs railroad cars at its general repair facilities. During the years 1996 through 1998, it was also engaged in the business of repairing coal cars. The coal car repair facilities and general repair facilities are located in different geographic areas. Its coal car repair business was conducted at nine coal car repair facilities, seven of which were sold to Buyer C, an unrelated corporation, in 1998. These seven facilities constituted 99 percent of the assets of Company A’s coal car repair business.

199939047

Company A and other businesses in this industry consider coal car repair to be a business separate and distinct from general railroad car repair because of certain differences between coal cars and other types of railroad cars.

Page 2

Company A operates each of its general repair facilities and coal car repair facilities as a separate business unit. Each facility has its own general manager who is responsible for the hiring and firing of employees at that facility. The employees of each facility provide services solely to that facility.

The payment of invoices related to each of Company A’s business units is made through a centralized payment system. Although Company A prepares separate budgets and financial statements for each business unit, the profitability of the coal car repair business was monitored on a monthly basis and analyzed on a quarterly basis. An employee based at Company A’s headquarters was responsible for generating sales solely for the coal car repair facilities.

Company A proposes to make lump sum distributions to those Plan X participants who became employees of Buyer C in connection with its acquisition of Company A’s coal car repair business. Company A has continued to maintain Plan X after such acquisition. Buyer C will not in any manner maintain Plan X, become an employer whose employees accrue benefits under Plan X, or assume any liabilities or assets of Plan X.

Based on the foregoing facts and representations, your authorized representatives have requested the following rulings on your behalf:

  1. That the disposition by Company A of the coal car repair facilities is the disposition of
    substantially all of the assets used by Company A in a trade or business within the meaning of Code section 401(k)(10)(A)(ii); and

  2. That the distribution by Plan X of account balances of participants under Plan X attributable
    to Company A’s contributions to participants who became employed by Buyer C will not violate the distribution restrictions set forth in Code section 401(k)(2)(B)(i).

Code section 401(a) provides that a trust created or organized in the United States and forming part of a stock bonus, pension, or profit-sharing plan of an employer for the exclusive benefit of his employees or their beneficiaries shall constitute a qualified trust under this section if certain requirements are met.

Code section 401(k)(1) states in pertinent part that a profit sharing plan shall not be considered as not satisfying the requirements of subsection (a) merely because the plan includes a qualified cash or deferred arrangement.

Code section 401(k)(2) sets forth the requirements to be a qualified cash or deferred arrangement, one of which is that distributions may not be made earlier than the occurrence of certain stated events. Section 401(k)(2)(B)(i)(II), when read together with section 401(k)(10)(A)(ii), further provides that one of these distributable events is the disposition by a corporation of substantially all its assets (within the meaning of section 409(d)(2)) used by the

199939047

corporation in a trade or business of such corporation to an unrelated corporation, but only with respect to an employee who continues employment with the corporation acquiring such assets.

Page 3

Section 1.401(k)-1(d)(4) of the Income Tax Regulations provides rules applicable to distributions upon the sale of assets. This regulation provides, in relevant part, that (i) the seller must maintain the plan, and the purchaser may not maintain the plan after the disposition; (ii) the employee receiving the distribution must continue employment with the purchaser of the assets: (iii) the distribution must be in connection with the disposition of the assets; and (iv) the sale of substantially all the assets used in a trade or business means the sale of at least 85 percent of the assets, and an unrelated entity is one that is not required to be aggregated with the seller under Code sections 414(b), (c), (m), or (o) after the sale or other disposition. Section 1.401(k)-1(d)(5) of the regulations provides, in pertinent part, that a distribution may be made only if it is a lump sum distribution within the meaning of section 402(d)(4) of the Code.

Your authorized representatives have represented that the coal car repair business is treated as a separate and distinct business from the other types of business conducted by Company A. The coal car repair business is comprised of repair facilities, each of which is operated as a separate business unit. Based on all the facts presented herein, we have determined that Business B is a trade or business as that term is used in Code section 401(k)(10)(A)(ii).

In this case, Company A sold to Buyer C, an unrelated entity, more than 85 percent of the assets used in its coal car repair business. Company A continues to maintain Plan X, and Buyer C does not maintain Plan X, after such sale. Distributions will be made in the form of lump sum distributions as described in Code section 402(d)(4).

Accordingly, with respect to your requested rulings, we rule as follows:

  1. That the disposition by Company A of the coal car repair facilities is the disposition of
    substantially all of the assets used by Company A in a trade or business within the meaning of Code section 401(k)(10)(A)(ii); and

  2. That the distribution by Plan X of account balances of participants under Plan X attributable
    to Company A’s contributions to participants who became employed by Buyer C will not violate the distribution restrictions set forth in Code section 401(k)(2)(B)(i).

This ruling letter is based on the assumption that Plan X continues to be otherwise qualified under Code section 401(a) at all relevant times.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

Page 4 199939047

A copy of this ruling letter has been sent to your authorized representative in accordance with a power of attorney on file with this office.

Sincerely yours,

Frances V. Sloan

Chief, Employee Plans
Technical Branch 3

Enclosures
Notice 437
Deleted copy of ruling letter

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace