PLR 9939042: Parent corporation gets more time to elect QSUB treatment for its subsidiary

Number
9939042
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Extension of Time for Making Certain Elections; Definitions
Code sections
§ 1361, § 6110
Ruling dated
June 30, 1999
Publicly released
October 1, 1999

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 1999, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 1999
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An S corporation acquired all the stock of another corporation and intended to treat it as a qualified subchapter S subsidiary (QSUB), but missed the election deadline. The IRS found that the requirements for relief under the election extension rules were satisfied. It gave the parent corporation 60 days from the letter's date to file Form 966 and make the QSUB election effective on the requested date. The IRS expressed no opinion on either corporation's S corporation status.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the parent make a late QSUB election effective on the date it acquired the subsidiary?
  • Outcome: Approved; the parent received 60 days to file Form 966.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 1361(b)(3)(B); Notice 97-4; Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

199939042

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Index Number: 9100.00-00; 1361.00-00 Washington, DC 20224

Person to Contact:
Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:DOM:P&SI:Br.1-PLR-109763-99

Date: JUN 30 1999

Legend

X =
Y =
D1 =
D2 =
D3 =
D4 =

This responds to your representative's letter dated May 17, 1999, written on behalf of X, requesting a ruling that X be given an extension of time to elect to treat Y as a Qualified Subchapter S Subsidiary (QSUB) for federal tax purposes for its taxable year beginning D1.

FACTS

X is a domestic corporation that elected to be taxed as a subchapter S corporation as of D2. Y is a domestic corporation formed D3, that elected to be taxed as a subchapter S corporation as of that date. On D1, the owners of Y contributed all of

2 199939042

PLR-109763-99

Y's stock to X. Although X intended that Y be a QSUB as of D1, X, failed to elect timely QSUB status for Y as of D1. X learned of this failure during D4.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 1361(b)(3)(B) defines the term "qualified subchapter S subsidiary" as a domestic corporation which is not an ineligible corporation if (1) 100 percent of the stock of the corporation is owned by the S corporation, and (2) the S corporation elects to treat the corporation as a QSUB. The statutory provision, however, does not provide guidance on the manner in which the QSUB election is made or the effective date of the election.

Notice 97-4, 1997-1 I.R.B. 24 provides a temporary procedure for making a QSUB election. Under Notice 97-4, a taxpayer makes a QSUB election with respect to a subsidiary by filing a Form 966, subject to certain modifications, with the appropriate service center. The election may be effective on the date the Form 966 is filed or up to 75 days prior to the filing of the form, provided that the date is not before the parent's first taxable year beginning after December 31, 1996, and that the subsidiary otherwise qualifies as a QSUB for the entire period for which the retroactive election is in effect.

Section 301.9100-1(c) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in § 301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election. Section 301.9100-1(b) defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation published in the Federal Register, or a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election. Section 301.9100-1(a).

Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.

Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government. Section 301.9100-3(a).

3 199939042

PLR-109763-99

CONCLUSIONS

Based solely on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that the requirements of § 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. As a result, X is granted an extension of time to elect to treat Y as a QSUB as of D1. X has until 60 days from the date of this letter to file Form 966 with the applicable service center to elect to treat Y as a QSUB for federal tax purposes as of D1.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter. Specifically, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning X's or Y's status as subchapter S corporations.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to X’s authorized representative.

Sincerely,

Paul F. Kugler
Assistant Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for section 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace