PLR 9936039: Parent permitted to make S corporation and Qsub elections
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 1999, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A corporation acquired two companies that already had S corporation elections, and planned to file a consolidated return with them for a short tax year. It sought permission to elect S corporation status and to treat the acquired companies as qualified Subchapter S subsidiaries on a later effective date. The IRS concluded that the parent was not a successor corporation under the regulation that can restrict a new S election after an earlier election terminates. It permitted the requested S corporation and subsidiary elections effective on the stated date. The ruling rests on the submitted facts and does not address other tax consequences of the transaction.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Can the parent make an S corporation election and Qsub elections for both acquired companies effective on the requested date?
- Outcome: Approved: the parent is not a successor corporation barred from making the elections.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361, 1362(g); Treas. Reg. § 1.1362-5(b)
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Index Number: 1361.05-00; 1362.00-00 Washington, DC 20224
Number: 199936039
Person to Contact:
Release Date: 9/10/1999
Telephone Number:
Refer Reply To:
CC:DOM:P&SI:1-PLR-104198-99
Date:
June 15, 1999
Legend:
A =
X =
Y =
Z =
D1 =
D2 =
D3 =
State =
This responds to the letter dated February 10, 1999, submitted on behalf of X requesting that we rule that X may make an S election and Qualified Subchapter S Subsidiary (Qsub) elections as to Y and Z effective D3.
FACTS
2
CC:DOM:P&SI:1-PLR-104198-99
X was incorporated under the laws of State on D1. Upon formation, X’s sole shareholder was A. On D2, X acquired all of the shares of Y and Z, each of which was a corporation with a Subchapter S election in effect. Prior to their acquisition by X, Y and Z were commonly owned by two shareholders, A and B, who had 25 percent and 75 percent interests, respectively. After the acquisition on D2, A held a 76.54 percent interest in X. X did not make an election to be treated as an S corporation under the Code effective D2, and for the short taxable year commencing D2, X, Y, and Z will file a consolidated return.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 1362(g) of the Code provides that, if a small business corporation has made an election under § 1362(a) and if such election has been terminated under § 1362(d), the corporation (and any successor corporation) is not eligible to make an election under § 1362(a) for any taxable year before its fifth taxable year which begins after its first taxable year for which the termination is effective, unless the Secretary consents to the election.
Section 1.1362-5(b) provides that a corporation is a successor corporation to a corporation whose election under § 1362 has been terminated if 50 percent or more of the stock of the corporation (new corporation) is owned, directly or indirectly, by the same persons who, on the date of the termination, owned 50 percent or more of the stock of the corporation whose election terminated (the old corporation); and either the new corporation acquires a substantial portion of the assets of the old corporation, or a substantial portion of the assets of the new corporation were assets of the old corporation.
CONCLUSION
Based solely on the information submitted, and the representations made, we conclude that X is not a successor corporation within the meaning of § 1.1362-5(b) and is permitted to make an S election and Qsub elections for Y and Z, effective D3.
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.
3
CC:DOM:P&SI:1-PLR-104198-99
Sincerely,
Signed/David R. Haglund
David R. Haglund
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 1
Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)
Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for §6110 purposes
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace