Initial partnership return with all zeros likely invalid under the Beard test

Number
202634014
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Miscellaneous Issues
Topics
Code sections
§ 1065
Ruling dated
March 6, 2026
Publicly released
August 21, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2026, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The Office of Chief Counsel advised that an initial partnership return showing ownership information but containing all zeros would most likely be invalid under the Beard test. The advice focused on whether the return contained sufficient data to allow calculation of tax. It noted that courts and IRS guidance have applied the Beard test to determine whether partnership returns are valid, while recognizing that a zero return may be valid when it accurately reflects the taxpayer's activity. The advice concluded that there was no indication the all-zero return accurately reflected the taxpayer's activity.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Would an initial partnership return showing ownership information but all zeros be a valid return under the Beard test?
  • Outcome: Advice, the return would most likely be invalid
  • Key authorities: Beard test; Huff v. Comm’r, 138 T.C. 258 (2012); YA Global Investments v. Comm’r, 161 T.C. 173, 264 (2023); Field Service Advisory 1992 WL 1354785

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2026030612260600 [Third Party Communication:

UILC: 9999.00-00 Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]

Number: 202634014
Release Date: 8/21/2026
From: -------------------------
Sent: Friday, March 6, 2026 12:26:06 PM
To: ---------------
Cc: ------------------------------
Bcc:
Subject: RE: -------------------------------- - Invalid Return Under Beard

----------

We agree with the RA’s memo that the initial return showing ownership information, but containing all 0s would most likely be considered invalid under application of the Beard test.

We believe the Beard test to determine validity of the purported return is applicable here, specifically the prong requiring sufficient data to allow calculation of tax. The Beard test doesn’t apply perfectly to partnership returns, but courts and Service guidance have applied it to determine the validity of a 1065 on several occasions. See e.g., Huff v. Comm’r, 138 T.C. 258 (2012); Field Service Advisory 1992 WL 1354785.

Numerous tax court decisions have found that a return (typically a 1040) containing all zeros, even if filed on an official IRS form, does not constitute a valid return. However, these are all in the tax protestor context and other cases have held that a zero return may be valid if there is reason to believe that is an accurate reflection of the taxpayer’s activity. YA Global Investments v. Comm’r, 161 T.C. 173, 264 (2023). There is no indication here that this is an accurate reflection of the taxpayer’s activity.

Let us know if there are additional questions you have for us.

Best,

-------------------
-----------------------
---------------------
--------------
------------------------------------------------------

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace